IWFV vs IWFM: which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
Every figure here is in pounds — what you'd actually pocket buying on the London Stock Exchange. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different in years when the pound moves against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.
IWFVtracks the MSCI World Enhanced Value Index
IWFMtracks the MSCI World Momentum Index
IWFV tracks the MSCI World Enhanced Value IndexIWFM tracks the MSCI World Momentum Index
What did the last 10 years do to £10,000?
You invest £10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.
IWFV vs IWFM, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | IWFV | IWFM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +33.94% | +29.24% | IWFV |
| 2025 | +30.69% | +12.72% | IWFV |
| 2024 | +6.85% | +32.62% | IWFM |
| 2023 | +13.02% | +5.85% | IWFV |
| 2022 | +0.95% | -8.21% | IWFV |
| 2021 | +21.60% | +15.58% | IWFV |
| 2020 | -6.91% | +24.16% | IWFM |
| 2019 | +14.69% | +23.25% | IWFM |
| 2018 | -9.34% | +1.62% | IWFM |
| 2017 | +12.04% | +20.40% | IWFM |
| 2016 | +29.68% | +25.05% | IWFV |
| 2015 | +1.33% | +8.82% | IWFM |
| 2014 | -34.90% | -32.51% | IWFM |
IWFV vs IWFM in plain words
IWFV tracks the MSCI World Enhanced Value Index while IWFM follows the MSCI World Momentum Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. Both funds charge 0.25% a year in running costs.
Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 13 calendar years both funds were trading, IWFV finished the year ahead 6 times and IWFM 7 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth £27,242 in IWFV versus £39,306 in IWFM by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.
IWVL is the London (USD) listing and IS3S the Xetra (EUR) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00BP3QZB59 — IWFV is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.
IWMO is the London (USD) listing and IS3R the Xetra (EUR) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00BP3QZ825 — IWFM is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.
Fund facts: IWFV vs IWFM
| Fact | IWFV | IWFM |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF | iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) |
| Tracks | MSCI World Enhanced Value Index | MSCI World Momentum Index |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.25% |
| Dividends | Accumulating — dividends reinvested | Accumulating — dividends reinvested |
| Launched | 3 Oct 2014 | 3 Oct 2014 |
| ISIN | IE00BP3QZB59 | IE00BP3QZ825 |
Frequently asked
Is IWFV or IWFM better?
Across the 13 calendar years both funds were trading, IWFV finished the year ahead 6 times and IWFM 7 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth £27,242 in IWFV versus £39,306 in IWFM by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between IWFV and IWFM?
IWFV tracks the MSCI World Enhanced Value Index while IWFM follows the MSCI World Momentum Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. Both funds charge 0.25% a year in running costs. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.
What would £10,000 in IWFV have become?
£10,000 invested in IWFV at the start of 2016 grew to £27,242 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 10.5% per year.
Related comparisons
More head-to-heads featuring IWFV or IWFM.