VHVG vs SWDA: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in pounds — what you'd actually pocket buying on the London Stock Exchange. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different in years when the pound moves against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

VHVG tracks the FTSE Developed World IndexSWDA tracks the MSCI World Index

What did the last 6 years do to £10,000?

You invest £10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 6 full years (2020–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.

VHVG turned it into
£20,355
+12.58% per year on average · 20202025
SWDA turned it into
£20,406
+12.62% per year on average · 20202025
Difference
−£51
SWDA made more of the same money

VHVG vs SWDA, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
8
where both funds were trading
VHVG won
4
years
SWDA won
4
years
YearVHVGSWDAWinner
2026 (so far)+12.47%+10.56%VHVG
2025+13.85%+12.64%VHVG
2024+19.99%+21.11%SWDA
2023+17.54%+17.59%SWDA
2022-8.16%-8.33%VHVG
2021+22.64%+23.64%SWDA
2020+12.56%+12.25%VHVG
2019-17.91%+23.03%SWDA
2018-3.78%
2017+11.78%
2016+29.59%
2015+4.06%
2014+12.58%
2013+25.32%
2012+9.19%
2011-6.19%
2010+14.57%
2009-34.91%

VHVG vs SWDA in plain words

VHVG tracks the FTSE Developed World Index while SWDA follows the MSCI World Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VHVG charges 0.12% a year in running costs and SWDA charges 0.20% — VHVG is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 8 calendar years both funds were trading, VHVG finished the year ahead 4 times and SWDA 4 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2020 was worth £20,355 in VHVG versus £20,406 in SWDA by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

VHVE is the London (USD) listing and VGVF the Xetra (EUR) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00BK5BQV03 — VHVG is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.

IWDA (London/Amsterdam, USD) and EUNL (Xetra, EUR) are listings of the same fund, ISIN IE00B4L5Y983 — SWDA is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.

Fund facts: VHVG vs SWDA

FactVHVGSWDA
FundVanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF (Acc)iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF (Acc)
TracksFTSE Developed World IndexMSCI World Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.12%0.20%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched24 Sept 201925 Sept 2009
ISINIE00BK5BQV03IE00B4L5Y983

Frequently asked

Is VHVG or SWDA better?

Across the 8 calendar years both funds were trading, VHVG finished the year ahead 4 times and SWDA 4 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2020 was worth £20,355 in VHVG versus £20,406 in SWDA by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between VHVG and SWDA?

VHVG tracks the FTSE Developed World Index while SWDA follows the MSCI World Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VHVG charges 0.12% a year in running costs and SWDA charges 0.20% — VHVG is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.

What would £10,000 in VHVG have become?

£10,000 invested in VHVG at the start of 2020 grew to £20,355 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 12.6% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring VHVG or SWDA.