CSP1 vs VHVG: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in pounds — what you'd actually pocket buying on the London Stock Exchange. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different in years when the pound moves against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

CSP1 tracks the S&P 500 IndexVHVG tracks the FTSE Developed World Index

What did the last 6 years do to £10,000?

You invest £10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 6 full years (2020–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.

CSP1 turned it into
£22,605
+14.56% per year on average · 20202025
VHVG turned it into
£20,355
+12.58% per year on average · 20202025
Difference
+£2,249
CSP1 made more of the same money

CSP1 vs VHVG, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
8
where both funds were trading
CSP1 won
5
years
VHVG won
3
years
YearCSP1VHVGWinner
2026 (so far)+10.66%+12.47%VHVG
2025+9.37%+13.85%VHVG
2024+27.35%+19.99%CSP1
2023+19.79%+17.54%CSP1
2022-9.05%-8.16%VHVG
2021+31.07%+22.64%CSP1
2020+13.65%+12.56%CSP1
2019+26.42%-17.91%CSP1
2018+0.01%
2017+10.83%
2016+34.10%
2015+5.78%
2014+22.03%
2013+31.40%
2012+7.14%
2011+1.73%
2010-26.08%

CSP1 vs VHVG in plain words

CSP1 tracks the S&P 500 Index while VHVG follows the FTSE Developed World Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. CSP1 charges 0.07% a year in running costs and VHVG charges 0.12% — CSP1 is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 8 calendar years both funds were trading, CSP1 finished the year ahead 5 times and VHVG 3 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2020 was worth £22,605 in CSP1 versus £20,355 in VHVG by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

CSPX is the London (USD) listing and SXR8 the Xetra (EUR) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00B5BMR087 — CSP1 is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.

VHVE is the London (USD) listing and VGVF the Xetra (EUR) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00BK5BQV03 — VHVG is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.

Fund facts: CSP1 vs VHVG

FactCSP1VHVG
FundiShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF (Acc)
TracksS&P 500 IndexFTSE Developed World Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.07%0.12%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched19 May 201024 Sept 2019
ISINIE00B5BMR087IE00BK5BQV03

Frequently asked

Is CSP1 or VHVG better?

Across the 8 calendar years both funds were trading, CSP1 finished the year ahead 5 times and VHVG 3 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2020 was worth £22,605 in CSP1 versus £20,355 in VHVG by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between CSP1 and VHVG?

CSP1 tracks the S&P 500 Index while VHVG follows the FTSE Developed World Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. CSP1 charges 0.07% a year in running costs and VHVG charges 0.12% — CSP1 is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.

What would £10,000 in CSP1 have become?

£10,000 invested in CSP1 at the start of 2020 grew to £22,605 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 14.6% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring CSP1 or VHVG.