CSP1 vs IWFQ: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in pounds — what you'd actually pocket buying on the London Stock Exchange. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different in years when the pound moves against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

CSP1 tracks the S&P 500 IndexIWFQ tracks the MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index

What did the last 10 years do to £10,000?

You invest £10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

CSP1 turned it into
£42,477
+15.56% per year on average · 20162025
IWFQ turned it into
£33,297
+12.78% per year on average · 20162025
Difference
+£9,180
CSP1 made more of the same money

CSP1 vs IWFQ, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
13
where both funds were trading
CSP1 won
10
years
IWFQ won
3
years
YearCSP1IWFQWinner
2026 (so far)+10.66%+11.18%IWFQ
2025+9.37%+7.40%CSP1
2024+27.35%+18.93%CSP1
2023+19.79%+19.15%CSP1
2022-9.05%-9.55%CSP1
2021+31.07%+25.17%CSP1
2020+13.65%+10.93%CSP1
2019+26.42%+25.86%CSP1
2018+0.01%-2.34%CSP1
2017+10.83%+12.47%IWFQ
2016+34.10%+26.01%CSP1
2015+5.78%+7.50%IWFQ
2014+22.03%-33.59%CSP1
2013+31.40%
2012+7.14%
2011+1.73%
2010-26.08%

CSP1 vs IWFQ in plain words

CSP1 tracks the S&P 500 Index while IWFQ follows the MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. CSP1 charges 0.07% a year in running costs and IWFQ charges 0.25% — CSP1 is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 13 calendar years both funds were trading, CSP1 finished the year ahead 10 times and IWFQ 3 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth £42,477 in CSP1 versus £33,297 in IWFQ by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

CSPX is the London (USD) listing and SXR8 the Xetra (EUR) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00B5BMR087 — CSP1 is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.

IWQU is the London (USD) listing and IS3Q the Xetra (EUR) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00BP3QZ601 — IWFQ is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.

Fund facts: CSP1 vs IWFQ

FactCSP1IWFQ
FundiShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)
TracksS&P 500 IndexMSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.07%0.25%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched19 May 20103 Oct 2014
ISINIE00B5BMR087IE00BP3QZ601

Frequently asked

Is CSP1 or IWFQ better?

Across the 13 calendar years both funds were trading, CSP1 finished the year ahead 10 times and IWFQ 3 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth £42,477 in CSP1 versus £33,297 in IWFQ by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between CSP1 and IWFQ?

CSP1 tracks the S&P 500 Index while IWFQ follows the MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. CSP1 charges 0.07% a year in running costs and IWFQ charges 0.25% — CSP1 is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.

What would £10,000 in CSP1 have become?

£10,000 invested in CSP1 at the start of 2016 grew to £42,477 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 15.6% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring CSP1 or IWFQ.