VWRP vs IWFQ: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in pounds — what you'd actually pocket buying on the London Stock Exchange. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different in years when the pound moves against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

VWRP tracks the FTSE All-World IndexIWFQ tracks the MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index

What did the last 6 years do to £10,000?

You invest £10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 6 full years (2020–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.

VWRP turned it into
£19,446
+11.72% per year on average · 20202025
IWFQ turned it into
£19,114
+11.40% per year on average · 20202025
Difference
+£332
VWRP made more of the same money

VWRP vs IWFQ, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
8
where both funds were trading
VWRP won
5
years
IWFQ won
3
years
YearVWRPIWFQWinner
2026 (so far)+12.35%+11.18%VWRP
2025+13.94%+7.40%VWRP
2024+19.60%+18.93%VWRP
2023+15.64%+19.15%IWFQ
2022-8.41%-9.55%VWRP
2021+20.00%+25.17%IWFQ
2020+12.27%+10.93%VWRP
2019+1.72%+25.86%IWFQ
2018-2.34%
2017+12.47%
2016+26.01%
2015+7.50%
2014-33.59%

VWRP vs IWFQ in plain words

VWRP tracks the FTSE All-World Index while IWFQ follows the MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VWRP charges 0.19% a year in running costs and IWFQ charges 0.25% — VWRP is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 8 calendar years both funds were trading, VWRP finished the year ahead 5 times and IWFQ 3 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2020 was worth £19,446 in VWRP versus £19,114 in IWFQ by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

VWRA is the London (USD) listing and VWCE the Xetra (EUR) line of the same accumulating share class, ISIN IE00BK5BQT80 — VWRP is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange; VWRL is its distributing sibling.

IWQU is the London (USD) listing and IS3Q the Xetra (EUR) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00BP3QZ601 — IWFQ is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.

Fund facts: VWRP vs IWFQ

FactVWRPIWFQ
FundVanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (Acc)iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)
TracksFTSE All-World IndexMSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.19%0.25%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched23 Jul 20193 Oct 2014
ISINIE00BK5BQT80IE00BP3QZ601

Frequently asked

Is VWRP or IWFQ better?

Across the 8 calendar years both funds were trading, VWRP finished the year ahead 5 times and IWFQ 3 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2020 was worth £19,446 in VWRP versus £19,114 in IWFQ by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between VWRP and IWFQ?

VWRP tracks the FTSE All-World Index while IWFQ follows the MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VWRP charges 0.19% a year in running costs and IWFQ charges 0.25% — VWRP is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.

What would £10,000 in VWRP have become?

£10,000 invested in VWRP at the start of 2020 grew to £19,446 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 11.7% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring VWRP or IWFQ.