VHYL vs IWFQ: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in pounds — what you'd actually pocket buying on the London Stock Exchange. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different in years when the pound moves against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

VHYL tracks the FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield IndexIWFQ tracks the MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index

What did the last 10 years do to £10,000?

You invest £10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

VHYL turned it into
£26,537
+10.25% per year on average · 20162025
IWFQ turned it into
£33,297
+12.78% per year on average · 20162025
Difference
−£6,760
IWFQ made more of the same money

VHYL vs IWFQ, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
13
where both funds were trading
VHYL won
5
years
IWFQ won
8
years
YearVHYLIWFQWinner
2026 (so far)+12.85%+11.18%VHYL
2025+18.22%+7.40%VHYL
2024+11.23%+18.93%IWFQ
2023+5.26%+19.15%IWFQ
2022+5.95%-9.55%VHYL
2021+19.24%+25.17%IWFQ
2020-3.74%+10.93%IWFQ
2019+17.00%+25.86%IWFQ
2018-6.59%-2.34%IWFQ
2017+8.80%+12.47%IWFQ
2016+32.59%+26.01%VHYL
2015-0.71%+7.50%IWFQ
2014+8.22%-33.59%VHYL
2013-1.85%

VHYL vs IWFQ in plain words

VHYL tracks the FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index while IWFQ follows the MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VHYL charges 0.29% a year in running costs and IWFQ charges 0.25% — IWFQ is the cheaper fund to hold.

IWFQ reinvests its dividends automatically (accumulating), while VHYL pays them out as cash (distributing). Across the 13 calendar years both funds were trading, VHYL finished the year ahead 5 times and IWFQ 8 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth £26,537 in VHYL versus £33,297 in IWFQ by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

VGWD is the Xetra (EUR) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00B8GKDB10 — VHYL is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.

IWQU is the London (USD) listing and IS3Q the Xetra (EUR) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00BP3QZ601 — IWFQ is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.

Fund facts: VHYL vs IWFQ

FactVHYLIWFQ
FundVanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF (Dist)iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)
TracksFTSE All-World High Dividend Yield IndexMSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.29%0.25%
DividendsDistributing — dividends paid outAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched21 May 20133 Oct 2014
ISINIE00B8GKDB10IE00BP3QZ601

Frequently asked

Is VHYL or IWFQ better?

Across the 13 calendar years both funds were trading, VHYL finished the year ahead 5 times and IWFQ 8 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth £26,537 in VHYL versus £33,297 in IWFQ by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between VHYL and IWFQ?

VHYL tracks the FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index while IWFQ follows the MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VHYL charges 0.29% a year in running costs and IWFQ charges 0.25% — IWFQ is the cheaper fund to hold. IWFQ reinvests its dividends automatically (accumulating), while VHYL pays them out as cash (distributing).

What would £10,000 in VHYL have become?

£10,000 invested in VHYL at the start of 2016 grew to £26,537 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 10.3% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring VHYL or IWFQ.