SSAC (ISAC) vs VHYL: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in pounds — what you'd actually pocket buying on the London Stock Exchange. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different in years when the pound moves against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

SSAC tracks the MSCI ACWI IndexVHYL tracks the FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index

What did the last 10 years do to £10,000?

You invest £10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

SSAC turned it into
£33,247
+12.77% per year on average · 20162025
VHYL turned it into
£26,537
+10.25% per year on average · 20162025
Difference
+£6,710
SSAC made more of the same money

SSAC vs VHYL, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
14
where both funds were trading
SSAC won
10
years
VHYL won
4
years
YearSSACVHYLWinner
2026 (so far)+12.33%+12.85%VHYL
2025+13.95%+18.22%VHYL
2024+19.63%+11.23%SSAC
2023+16.14%+5.26%SSAC
2022-8.56%+5.95%VHYL
2021+20.35%+19.24%SSAC
2020+11.80%-3.74%SSAC
2019+22.09%+17.00%SSAC
2018-4.76%-6.59%SSAC
2017+13.26%+8.80%SSAC
2016+29.60%+32.59%VHYL
2015+1.60%-0.71%SSAC
2014+11.27%+8.22%SSAC
2013+21.20%-1.85%SSAC
2012+9.30%
2011-35.63%

SSAC vs VHYL in plain words

SSAC tracks the MSCI ACWI Index while VHYL follows the FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SSAC charges 0.20% a year in running costs and VHYL charges 0.29% — SSAC is the cheaper fund to hold.

SSAC reinvests its dividends automatically (accumulating), while VHYL pays them out as cash (distributing). Across the 14 calendar years both funds were trading, SSAC finished the year ahead 10 times and VHYL 4 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth £33,247 in SSAC versus £26,537 in VHYL by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

ISAC is the London (USD) listing and IUSQ the Xetra (EUR) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00B6R52259 — SSAC is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.

VGWD is the Xetra (EUR) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00B8GKDB10 — VHYL is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.

Fund facts: SSAC vs VHYL

FactSSACVHYL
FundiShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF (Dist)
TracksMSCI ACWI IndexFTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.20%0.29%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedDistributing — dividends paid out
Launched21 Oct 201121 May 2013
ISINIE00B6R52259IE00B8GKDB10
Also trades asISAC

Frequently asked

Is SSAC or VHYL better?

Across the 14 calendar years both funds were trading, SSAC finished the year ahead 10 times and VHYL 4 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth £33,247 in SSAC versus £26,537 in VHYL by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between SSAC and VHYL?

SSAC tracks the MSCI ACWI Index while VHYL follows the FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SSAC charges 0.20% a year in running costs and VHYL charges 0.29% — SSAC is the cheaper fund to hold. SSAC reinvests its dividends automatically (accumulating), while VHYL pays them out as cash (distributing).

What would £10,000 in SSAC have become?

£10,000 invested in SSAC at the start of 2016 grew to £33,247 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 12.8% per year.

Is ISAC the same as SSAC?

ISAC is the London (USD) listing and IUSQ the Xetra (EUR) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00B6R52259 — SSAC is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring SSAC or VHYL.