SSAC (ISAC) vs CNX1: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in pounds — what you'd actually pocket buying on the London Stock Exchange. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different in years when the pound moves against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

SSAC tracks the MSCI ACWI IndexCNX1 tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index

What did the last 10 years do to £10,000?

You invest £10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

SSAC turned it into
£33,247
+12.77% per year on average · 20162025
CNX1 turned it into
£63,451
+20.29% per year on average · 20162025
Difference
−£30,204
CNX1 made more of the same money

SSAC vs CNX1, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
16
where both funds were trading
SSAC won
4
years
CNX1 won
12
years
YearSSACCNX1Winner
2026 (so far)+12.33%+20.13%CNX1
2025+13.95%+11.83%SSAC
2024+19.63%+28.51%CNX1
2023+16.14%+47.71%CNX1
2022-8.56%-25.53%SSAC
2021+20.35%+29.50%CNX1
2020+11.80%+43.24%CNX1
2019+22.09%+33.63%CNX1
2018-4.76%+4.62%CNX1
2017+13.26%+20.13%CNX1
2016+29.60%+28.85%SSAC
2015+1.60%+14.71%CNX1
2014+11.27%+28.19%CNX1
2013+21.20%+36.05%CNX1
2012+9.30%+9.20%SSAC
2011-35.63%+3.56%CNX1
2010-20.33%

SSAC vs CNX1 in plain words

SSAC tracks the MSCI ACWI Index while CNX1 follows the Nasdaq-100 Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SSAC charges 0.20% a year in running costs and CNX1 charges 0.30% — SSAC is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 16 calendar years both funds were trading, SSAC finished the year ahead 4 times and CNX1 12 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth £33,247 in SSAC versus £63,451 in CNX1 by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

ISAC is the London (USD) listing and IUSQ the Xetra (EUR) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00B6R52259 — SSAC is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.

CNDX is the London (USD) listing and SXRV the Xetra (EUR) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00B53SZB19 — CNX1 is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.

Fund facts: SSAC vs CNX1

FactSSACCNX1
FundiShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (Acc)
TracksMSCI ACWI IndexNasdaq-100 Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.20%0.30%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched21 Oct 201126 Jan 2010
ISINIE00B6R52259IE00B53SZB19
Also trades asISAC

Frequently asked

Is SSAC or CNX1 better?

Across the 16 calendar years both funds were trading, SSAC finished the year ahead 4 times and CNX1 12 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth £33,247 in SSAC versus £63,451 in CNX1 by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between SSAC and CNX1?

SSAC tracks the MSCI ACWI Index while CNX1 follows the Nasdaq-100 Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SSAC charges 0.20% a year in running costs and CNX1 charges 0.30% — SSAC is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.

What would £10,000 in SSAC have become?

£10,000 invested in SSAC at the start of 2016 grew to £33,247 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 12.8% per year.

Is ISAC the same as SSAC?

ISAC is the London (USD) listing and IUSQ the Xetra (EUR) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00B6R52259 — SSAC is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring SSAC or CNX1.