VWRP vs CNX1: which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
Every figure here is in pounds — what you'd actually pocket buying on the London Stock Exchange. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different in years when the pound moves against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.
VWRPtracks the FTSE All-World Index
CNX1tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index
VWRP tracks the FTSE All-World IndexCNX1 tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index
What did the last 6 years do to £10,000?
You invest £10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 6 full years (2020–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.
VWRP vs CNX1, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | VWRP | CNX1 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +12.35% | +20.13% | CNX1 |
| 2025 | +13.94% | +11.83% | VWRP |
| 2024 | +19.60% | +28.51% | CNX1 |
| 2023 | +15.64% | +47.71% | CNX1 |
| 2022 | -8.41% | -25.53% | VWRP |
| 2021 | +20.00% | +29.50% | CNX1 |
| 2020 | +12.27% | +43.24% | CNX1 |
| 2019 | +1.72% | +33.63% | CNX1 |
| 2018 | — | +4.62% | — |
| 2017 | — | +20.13% | — |
| 2016 | — | +28.85% | — |
| 2015 | — | +14.71% | — |
| 2014 | — | +28.19% | — |
| 2013 | — | +36.05% | — |
| 2012 | — | +9.20% | — |
| 2011 | — | +3.56% | — |
| 2010 | — | -20.33% | — |
VWRP vs CNX1 in plain words
VWRP tracks the FTSE All-World Index while CNX1 follows the Nasdaq-100 Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VWRP charges 0.19% a year in running costs and CNX1 charges 0.30% — VWRP is the cheaper fund to hold.
Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 8 calendar years both funds were trading, VWRP finished the year ahead 2 times and CNX1 6 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2020 was worth £19,446 in VWRP versus £29,324 in CNX1 by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.
VWRA is the London (USD) listing and VWCE the Xetra (EUR) line of the same accumulating share class, ISIN IE00BK5BQT80 — VWRP is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange; VWRL is its distributing sibling.
CNDX is the London (USD) listing and SXRV the Xetra (EUR) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00B53SZB19 — CNX1 is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.
Fund facts: VWRP vs CNX1
| Fact | VWRP | CNX1 |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (Acc) | iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (Acc) |
| Tracks | FTSE All-World Index | Nasdaq-100 Index |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.30% |
| Dividends | Accumulating — dividends reinvested | Accumulating — dividends reinvested |
| Launched | 23 Jul 2019 | 26 Jan 2010 |
| ISIN | IE00BK5BQT80 | IE00B53SZB19 |
Frequently asked
Is VWRP or CNX1 better?
Across the 8 calendar years both funds were trading, VWRP finished the year ahead 2 times and CNX1 6 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2020 was worth £19,446 in VWRP versus £29,324 in CNX1 by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between VWRP and CNX1?
VWRP tracks the FTSE All-World Index while CNX1 follows the Nasdaq-100 Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VWRP charges 0.19% a year in running costs and CNX1 charges 0.30% — VWRP is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.
What would £10,000 in VWRP have become?
£10,000 invested in VWRP at the start of 2020 grew to £19,446 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 11.7% per year.
Related comparisons
More head-to-heads featuring VWRP or CNX1.