VWRP vs CNX1: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in pounds — what you'd actually pocket buying on the London Stock Exchange. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different in years when the pound moves against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

VWRP tracks the FTSE All-World IndexCNX1 tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index

What did the last 6 years do to £10,000?

You invest £10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 6 full years (2020–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.

VWRP turned it into
£19,446
+11.72% per year on average · 20202025
CNX1 turned it into
£29,324
+19.64% per year on average · 20202025
Difference
−£9,879
CNX1 made more of the same money

VWRP vs CNX1, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
8
where both funds were trading
VWRP won
2
years
CNX1 won
6
years
YearVWRPCNX1Winner
2026 (so far)+12.35%+20.13%CNX1
2025+13.94%+11.83%VWRP
2024+19.60%+28.51%CNX1
2023+15.64%+47.71%CNX1
2022-8.41%-25.53%VWRP
2021+20.00%+29.50%CNX1
2020+12.27%+43.24%CNX1
2019+1.72%+33.63%CNX1
2018+4.62%
2017+20.13%
2016+28.85%
2015+14.71%
2014+28.19%
2013+36.05%
2012+9.20%
2011+3.56%
2010-20.33%

VWRP vs CNX1 in plain words

VWRP tracks the FTSE All-World Index while CNX1 follows the Nasdaq-100 Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VWRP charges 0.19% a year in running costs and CNX1 charges 0.30% — VWRP is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 8 calendar years both funds were trading, VWRP finished the year ahead 2 times and CNX1 6 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2020 was worth £19,446 in VWRP versus £29,324 in CNX1 by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

VWRA is the London (USD) listing and VWCE the Xetra (EUR) line of the same accumulating share class, ISIN IE00BK5BQT80 — VWRP is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange; VWRL is its distributing sibling.

CNDX is the London (USD) listing and SXRV the Xetra (EUR) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00B53SZB19 — CNX1 is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.

Fund facts: VWRP vs CNX1

FactVWRPCNX1
FundVanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (Acc)iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (Acc)
TracksFTSE All-World IndexNasdaq-100 Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.19%0.30%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched23 Jul 201926 Jan 2010
ISINIE00BK5BQT80IE00B53SZB19

Frequently asked

Is VWRP or CNX1 better?

Across the 8 calendar years both funds were trading, VWRP finished the year ahead 2 times and CNX1 6 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2020 was worth £19,446 in VWRP versus £29,324 in CNX1 by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between VWRP and CNX1?

VWRP tracks the FTSE All-World Index while CNX1 follows the Nasdaq-100 Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VWRP charges 0.19% a year in running costs and CNX1 charges 0.30% — VWRP is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.

What would £10,000 in VWRP have become?

£10,000 invested in VWRP at the start of 2020 grew to £19,446 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 11.7% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring VWRP or CNX1.