SSAC (ISAC) vs SWDA: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in pounds — what you'd actually pocket buying on the London Stock Exchange. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different in years when the pound moves against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

SSAC tracks the MSCI ACWI IndexSWDA tracks the MSCI World Index

What did the last 10 years do to £10,000?

You invest £10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

SSAC turned it into
£33,247
+12.77% per year on average · 20162025
SWDA turned it into
£34,992
+13.34% per year on average · 20162025
Difference
−£1,745
SWDA made more of the same money

SSAC vs SWDA, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
16
where both funds were trading
SSAC won
5
years
SWDA won
11
years
YearSSACSWDAWinner
2026 (so far)+12.33%+10.56%SSAC
2025+13.95%+12.64%SSAC
2024+19.63%+21.11%SWDA
2023+16.14%+17.59%SWDA
2022-8.56%-8.33%SWDA
2021+20.35%+23.64%SWDA
2020+11.80%+12.25%SWDA
2019+22.09%+23.03%SWDA
2018-4.76%-3.78%SWDA
2017+13.26%+11.78%SSAC
2016+29.60%+29.59%SSAC
2015+1.60%+4.06%SWDA
2014+11.27%+12.58%SWDA
2013+21.20%+25.32%SWDA
2012+9.30%+9.19%SSAC
2011-35.63%-6.19%SWDA
2010+14.57%
2009-34.91%

SSAC vs SWDA in plain words

SSAC tracks the MSCI ACWI Index while SWDA follows the MSCI World Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. Both funds charge 0.20% a year in running costs.

Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 16 calendar years both funds were trading, SSAC finished the year ahead 5 times and SWDA 11 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth £33,247 in SSAC versus £34,992 in SWDA by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

ISAC is the London (USD) listing and IUSQ the Xetra (EUR) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00B6R52259 — SSAC is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.

IWDA (London/Amsterdam, USD) and EUNL (Xetra, EUR) are listings of the same fund, ISIN IE00B4L5Y983 — SWDA is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.

Fund facts: SSAC vs SWDA

FactSSACSWDA
FundiShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF (Acc)
TracksMSCI ACWI IndexMSCI World Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.20%0.20%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched21 Oct 201125 Sept 2009
ISINIE00B6R52259IE00B4L5Y983
Also trades asISAC

Frequently asked

Is SSAC or SWDA better?

Across the 16 calendar years both funds were trading, SSAC finished the year ahead 5 times and SWDA 11 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth £33,247 in SSAC versus £34,992 in SWDA by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between SSAC and SWDA?

SSAC tracks the MSCI ACWI Index while SWDA follows the MSCI World Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. Both funds charge 0.20% a year in running costs. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.

What would £10,000 in SSAC have become?

£10,000 invested in SSAC at the start of 2016 grew to £33,247 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 12.8% per year.

Is ISAC the same as SSAC?

ISAC is the London (USD) listing and IUSQ the Xetra (EUR) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00B6R52259 — SSAC is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring SSAC or SWDA.