SSAC (ISAC) vs VHVG: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in pounds — what you'd actually pocket buying on the London Stock Exchange. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different in years when the pound moves against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

SSAC tracks the MSCI ACWI IndexVHVG tracks the FTSE Developed World Index

What did the last 6 years do to £10,000?

You invest £10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 6 full years (2020–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.

SSAC turned it into
£19,479
+11.75% per year on average · 20202025
VHVG turned it into
£20,355
+12.58% per year on average · 20202025
Difference
−£876
VHVG made more of the same money

SSAC vs VHVG, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
8
where both funds were trading
SSAC won
2
years
VHVG won
6
years
YearSSACVHVGWinner
2026 (so far)+12.33%+12.47%VHVG
2025+13.95%+13.85%SSAC
2024+19.63%+19.99%VHVG
2023+16.14%+17.54%VHVG
2022-8.56%-8.16%VHVG
2021+20.35%+22.64%VHVG
2020+11.80%+12.56%VHVG
2019+22.09%-17.91%SSAC
2018-4.76%
2017+13.26%
2016+29.60%
2015+1.60%
2014+11.27%
2013+21.20%
2012+9.30%
2011-35.63%

SSAC vs VHVG in plain words

SSAC tracks the MSCI ACWI Index while VHVG follows the FTSE Developed World Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SSAC charges 0.20% a year in running costs and VHVG charges 0.12% — VHVG is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 8 calendar years both funds were trading, SSAC finished the year ahead 2 times and VHVG 6 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2020 was worth £19,479 in SSAC versus £20,355 in VHVG by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

ISAC is the London (USD) listing and IUSQ the Xetra (EUR) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00B6R52259 — SSAC is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.

VHVE is the London (USD) listing and VGVF the Xetra (EUR) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00BK5BQV03 — VHVG is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.

Fund facts: SSAC vs VHVG

FactSSACVHVG
FundiShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF (Acc)
TracksMSCI ACWI IndexFTSE Developed World Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.20%0.12%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched21 Oct 201124 Sept 2019
ISINIE00B6R52259IE00BK5BQV03
Also trades asISAC

Frequently asked

Is SSAC or VHVG better?

Across the 8 calendar years both funds were trading, SSAC finished the year ahead 2 times and VHVG 6 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2020 was worth £19,479 in SSAC versus £20,355 in VHVG by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between SSAC and VHVG?

SSAC tracks the MSCI ACWI Index while VHVG follows the FTSE Developed World Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SSAC charges 0.20% a year in running costs and VHVG charges 0.12% — VHVG is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.

What would £10,000 in SSAC have become?

£10,000 invested in SSAC at the start of 2020 grew to £19,479 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 11.8% per year.

Is ISAC the same as SSAC?

ISAC is the London (USD) listing and IUSQ the Xetra (EUR) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00B6R52259 — SSAC is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring SSAC or VHVG.