SWDA vs CNX1: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in pounds — what you'd actually pocket buying on the London Stock Exchange. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different in years when the pound moves against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

SWDA tracks the MSCI World IndexCNX1 tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index

What did the last 10 years do to £10,000?

You invest £10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

SWDA turned it into
£34,992
+13.34% per year on average · 20162025
CNX1 turned it into
£63,451
+20.29% per year on average · 20162025
Difference
−£28,459
CNX1 made more of the same money

SWDA vs CNX1, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
17
where both funds were trading
SWDA won
4
years
CNX1 won
13
years
YearSWDACNX1Winner
2026 (so far)+10.56%+20.13%CNX1
2025+12.64%+11.83%SWDA
2024+21.11%+28.51%CNX1
2023+17.59%+47.71%CNX1
2022-8.33%-25.53%SWDA
2021+23.64%+29.50%CNX1
2020+12.25%+43.24%CNX1
2019+23.03%+33.63%CNX1
2018-3.78%+4.62%CNX1
2017+11.78%+20.13%CNX1
2016+29.59%+28.85%SWDA
2015+4.06%+14.71%CNX1
2014+12.58%+28.19%CNX1
2013+25.32%+36.05%CNX1
2012+9.19%+9.20%CNX1
2011-6.19%+3.56%CNX1
2010+14.57%-20.33%SWDA
2009-34.91%

SWDA vs CNX1 in plain words

SWDA tracks the MSCI World Index while CNX1 follows the Nasdaq-100 Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SWDA charges 0.20% a year in running costs and CNX1 charges 0.30% — SWDA is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 17 calendar years both funds were trading, SWDA finished the year ahead 4 times and CNX1 13 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth £34,992 in SWDA versus £63,451 in CNX1 by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

IWDA (London/Amsterdam, USD) and EUNL (Xetra, EUR) are listings of the same fund, ISIN IE00B4L5Y983 — SWDA is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.

CNDX is the London (USD) listing and SXRV the Xetra (EUR) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00B53SZB19 — CNX1 is its GBP line on the London Stock Exchange.

Fund facts: SWDA vs CNX1

FactSWDACNX1
FundiShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF (Acc)iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (Acc)
TracksMSCI World IndexNasdaq-100 Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.20%0.30%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched25 Sept 200926 Jan 2010
ISINIE00B4L5Y983IE00B53SZB19

Frequently asked

Is SWDA or CNX1 better?

Across the 17 calendar years both funds were trading, SWDA finished the year ahead 4 times and CNX1 13 times. £10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth £34,992 in SWDA versus £63,451 in CNX1 by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between SWDA and CNX1?

SWDA tracks the MSCI World Index while CNX1 follows the Nasdaq-100 Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SWDA charges 0.20% a year in running costs and CNX1 charges 0.30% — SWDA is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.

What would £10,000 in SWDA have become?

£10,000 invested in SWDA at the start of 2016 grew to £34,992 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 13.3% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring SWDA or CNX1.