Originave

SXRV (CNDX) vs DEGC: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in euros — what you'd actually pocket buying on Xetra. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different: in 2025 a world tracker rose about 23% in dollars but only about 9% in euros, because the euro gained roughly 13% against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

Fund A
iShares logoSXRV
Fund B
DimensionalDEGC

SXRV tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index

SXRV vs DEGC, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
2
where both funds were trading
SXRV won
2
years
DEGC won
0
years
YearSXRVDEGCWinner
2026 (so far)+21.95%+12.65%SXRV
2025+6.79%+1.95%SXRV
2024+33.55%——
2023+51.19%——
2022-30.05%——
2021+39.34%——
2020+34.48%——
2019+42.90%——
2018+3.03%——
2017+15.81%——
2016+9.96%——
2015+21.87%——
2014+37.26%——
2013+32.30%——
2012+13.01%——
2011+5.73%——
2010-9.35%——

SXRV vs DEGC in plain words

SXRV tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index while DEGC follows the Dimensional Global Core Equity strategy, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SXRV charges 0.30% a year in running costs and DEGC charges 0.26% — DEGC is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 2 calendar years both funds were trading, SXRV finished the year ahead 2 times and DEGC 0 times.

CNDX is the London/Amsterdam listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00B53SZB19 — SXRV is its EUR line on Xetra.

Actively managed: it weights developed-market companies towards low valuations, high profitability and smaller size rather than following an index, and measures itself against the MSCI World.

Fund facts: SXRV vs DEGC

FactSXRVDEGC
FundiShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (Acc)Dimensional Global Core Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
TracksNasdaq-100 IndexDimensional Global Core Equity strategy
Yearly cost (TER)0.30%0.26%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched26 Jan 201012 Nov 2025
ISINIE00B53SZB19IE000EGGFVG6
WKNA0YEDLA41E9T
Also trades asCNDX—

Frequently asked

Is SXRV or DEGC better?

Across the 2 calendar years both funds were trading, SXRV finished the year ahead 2 times and DEGC 0 times. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between SXRV and DEGC?

SXRV tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index while DEGC follows the Dimensional Global Core Equity strategy, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SXRV charges 0.30% a year in running costs and DEGC charges 0.26% — DEGC is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.

Is CNDX the same as SXRV?

CNDX is the London/Amsterdam listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00B53SZB19 — SXRV is its EUR line on Xetra.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring SXRV or DEGC.

SXR8vsSXRVVUAAvsSXRVSPYLvsSXRVSPYYvsSXRVSPYIvsSXRVVWCEvsSXRVWEBNvsSXRVEUNLvsSXRV