WEBN vs SXRV (CNDX): which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
Every figure here is in euros — what you'd actually pocket buying on Xetra. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different: in 2025 a world tracker rose about 23% in dollars but only about 9% in euros, because the euro gained roughly 13% against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.
WEBNtracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index
SXRVtracks the Nasdaq-100 Index
WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap IndexSXRV tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index
What did the last 1 years do to €10,000?
You invest €10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 1 full years (2025–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.
WEBN vs SXRV, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | WEBN | SXRV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +13.37% | +21.95% | SXRV |
| 2025 | +9.70% | +6.79% | WEBN |
| 2024 | +6.17% | +33.55% | SXRV |
| 2023 | — | +51.19% | — |
| 2022 | — | -30.05% | — |
| 2021 | — | +39.34% | — |
| 2020 | — | +34.48% | — |
| 2019 | — | +42.90% | — |
| 2018 | — | +3.03% | — |
| 2017 | — | +15.81% | — |
| 2016 | — | +9.96% | — |
| 2015 | — | +21.87% | — |
| 2014 | — | +37.26% | — |
| 2013 | — | +32.30% | — |
| 2012 | — | +13.01% | — |
| 2011 | — | +5.73% | — |
| 2010 | — | -9.35% | — |
WEBN vs SXRV in plain words
WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while SXRV follows the Nasdaq-100 Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. WEBN charges 0.07% a year in running costs and SXRV charges 0.30% — WEBN is the cheaper fund to hold.
Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 3 calendar years both funds were trading, WEBN finished the year ahead 1 times and SXRV 2 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2025 was worth €10,970 in WEBN versus €10,679 in SXRV by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.
CNDX is the London/Amsterdam listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00B53SZB19 — SXRV is its EUR line on Xetra.
Fund facts: WEBN vs SXRV
| Fact | WEBN | SXRV |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF (Acc) | iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (Acc) |
| Tracks | Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index | Nasdaq-100 Index |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.07% | 0.30% |
| Dividends | Accumulating — dividends reinvested | Accumulating — dividends reinvested |
| Launched | 5 Jun 2024 | 26 Jan 2010 |
| ISIN | IE0003XJA0J9 | IE00B53SZB19 |
| WKN | ETF151 | A0YEDL |
| Also trades as | — | CNDX |
Frequently asked
Is WEBN or SXRV better?
Across the 3 calendar years both funds were trading, WEBN finished the year ahead 1 times and SXRV 2 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2025 was worth €10,970 in WEBN versus €10,679 in SXRV by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between WEBN and SXRV?
WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while SXRV follows the Nasdaq-100 Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. WEBN charges 0.07% a year in running costs and SXRV charges 0.30% — WEBN is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.
What would €10,000 in WEBN have become?
€10,000 invested in WEBN at the start of 2025 grew to €10,970 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 9.7% per year.
Is CNDX the same as SXRV?
CNDX is the London/Amsterdam listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00B53SZB19 — SXRV is its EUR line on Xetra.
Related comparisons
More head-to-heads featuring WEBN or SXRV.