WEBN vs SXRV (CNDX): which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in euros — what you'd actually pocket buying on Xetra. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different: in 2025 a world tracker rose about 23% in dollars but only about 9% in euros, because the euro gained roughly 13% against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap IndexSXRV tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index

What did the last 1 years do to €10,000?

You invest €10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 1 full years (2025–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.

WEBN turned it into
€10,970
+9.70% per year on average · 20252025
SXRV turned it into
€10,679
+6.79% per year on average · 20252025
Difference
+€291
WEBN made more of the same money

WEBN vs SXRV, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
3
where both funds were trading
WEBN won
1
years
SXRV won
2
years
YearWEBNSXRVWinner
2026 (so far)+13.37%+21.95%SXRV
2025+9.70%+6.79%WEBN
2024+6.17%+33.55%SXRV
2023+51.19%
2022-30.05%
2021+39.34%
2020+34.48%
2019+42.90%
2018+3.03%
2017+15.81%
2016+9.96%
2015+21.87%
2014+37.26%
2013+32.30%
2012+13.01%
2011+5.73%
2010-9.35%

WEBN vs SXRV in plain words

WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while SXRV follows the Nasdaq-100 Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. WEBN charges 0.07% a year in running costs and SXRV charges 0.30% — WEBN is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 3 calendar years both funds were trading, WEBN finished the year ahead 1 times and SXRV 2 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2025 was worth €10,970 in WEBN versus €10,679 in SXRV by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

CNDX is the London/Amsterdam listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00B53SZB19 — SXRV is its EUR line on Xetra.

Fund facts: WEBN vs SXRV

FactWEBNSXRV
FundAmundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF (Acc)iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (Acc)
TracksSolactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap IndexNasdaq-100 Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.07%0.30%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched5 Jun 202426 Jan 2010
ISINIE0003XJA0J9IE00B53SZB19
WKNETF151A0YEDL
Also trades asCNDX

Frequently asked

Is WEBN or SXRV better?

Across the 3 calendar years both funds were trading, WEBN finished the year ahead 1 times and SXRV 2 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2025 was worth €10,970 in WEBN versus €10,679 in SXRV by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between WEBN and SXRV?

WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while SXRV follows the Nasdaq-100 Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. WEBN charges 0.07% a year in running costs and SXRV charges 0.30% — WEBN is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.

What would €10,000 in WEBN have become?

€10,000 invested in WEBN at the start of 2025 grew to €10,970 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 9.7% per year.

Is CNDX the same as SXRV?

CNDX is the London/Amsterdam listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00B53SZB19 — SXRV is its EUR line on Xetra.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring WEBN or SXRV.