Originave

SPYY vs WEBN: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in euros — what you'd actually pocket buying on Xetra. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different: in 2025 a world tracker rose about 23% in dollars but only about 9% in euros, because the euro gained roughly 13% against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

Fund A
State Street logoSPYY
Fund B
Amundi logoWEBN

SPYY tracks the MSCI ACWI IndexWEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index

What did the last 1 years do to €10,000?

You invest €10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 1 full years (2025–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.

SPYY turned it into
€10,946
+9.46% per year on average · 2025–2025
WEBN turned it into
€10,970
+9.70% per year on average · 2025–2025
Difference
−€24
WEBN made more of the same money

SPYY vs WEBN, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
3
where both funds were trading
SPYY won
2
years
WEBN won
1
years
YearSPYYWEBNWinner
2026 (so far)+13.67%+13.37%SPYY
2025+9.46%+9.70%WEBN
2024+24.56%+6.17%SPYY
2023+18.22%——
2022-13.76%——
2021+29.02%——
2020+5.12%——
2019+30.21%——
2018-6.02%——
2017+8.80%——
2016+12.34%——
2015+8.88%——
2014+18.80%——
2013+17.52%——
2012+9.67%——

SPYY vs WEBN in plain words

SPYY tracks the MSCI ACWI Index while WEBN follows the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SPYY charges 0.12% a year in running costs and WEBN charges 0.07% — WEBN is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 3 calendar years both funds were trading, SPYY finished the year ahead 2 times and WEBN 1 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2025 was worth €10,946 in SPYY versus €10,970 in WEBN by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

Fund facts: SPYY vs WEBN

FactSPYYWEBN
FundSPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF (Acc)
TracksMSCI ACWI IndexSolactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.12%0.07%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched13 May 20115 Jun 2024
ISINIE00B44Z5B48IE0003XJA0J9
WKNA1JJTCETF151

Frequently asked

Is SPYY or WEBN better?

Across the 3 calendar years both funds were trading, SPYY finished the year ahead 2 times and WEBN 1 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2025 was worth €10,946 in SPYY versus €10,970 in WEBN by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between SPYY and WEBN?

SPYY tracks the MSCI ACWI Index while WEBN follows the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SPYY charges 0.12% a year in running costs and WEBN charges 0.07% — WEBN is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.

What would €10,000 in SPYY have become?

€10,000 invested in SPYY at the start of 2025 grew to €10,946 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 9.5% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring SPYY or WEBN.

SXR8vsSPYYVUAAvsSPYYSPYLvsSPYYSPYYvsSPYISPYYvsVWCESPYYvsEUNLSPYYvsIUSQSPYYvsVGVF