Originave

SPYL vs WEBN: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in euros — what you'd actually pocket buying on Xetra. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different: in 2025 a world tracker rose about 23% in dollars but only about 9% in euros, because the euro gained roughly 13% against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

Fund A
State Street logoSPYL
Fund B
Amundi logoWEBN

SPYL tracks the S&P 500 IndexWEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index

What did the last 1 years do to €10,000?

You invest €10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 1 full years (2025–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.

SPYL turned it into
€10,471
+4.71% per year on average · 2025–2025
WEBN turned it into
€10,970
+9.70% per year on average · 2025–2025
Difference
−€499
WEBN made more of the same money

SPYL vs WEBN, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
3
where both funds were trading
SPYL won
1
years
WEBN won
2
years
YearSPYLWEBNWinner
2026 (so far)+12.05%+13.37%WEBN
2025+4.71%+9.70%WEBN
2024+32.33%+6.17%SPYL
2023+8.23%——

SPYL vs WEBN in plain words

SPYL tracks the S&P 500 Index while WEBN follows the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SPYL charges 0.03% a year in running costs and WEBN charges 0.07% — SPYL is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 3 calendar years both funds were trading, SPYL finished the year ahead 1 times and WEBN 2 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2025 was worth €10,471 in SPYL versus €10,970 in WEBN by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

SPYL also trades in USD on the London Stock Exchange, where SPXL is its GBP line, ISIN IE000XZSV718 — this page follows its EUR line on Xetra.

Fund facts: SPYL vs WEBN

FactSPYLWEBN
FundSPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (Acc)Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF (Acc)
TracksS&P 500 IndexSolactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.03%0.07%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched31 Oct 20235 Jun 2024
ISINIE000XZSV718IE0003XJA0J9
WKNA3EUC1ETF151

Frequently asked

Is SPYL or WEBN better?

Across the 3 calendar years both funds were trading, SPYL finished the year ahead 1 times and WEBN 2 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2025 was worth €10,471 in SPYL versus €10,970 in WEBN by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between SPYL and WEBN?

SPYL tracks the S&P 500 Index while WEBN follows the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SPYL charges 0.03% a year in running costs and WEBN charges 0.07% — SPYL is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.

What would €10,000 in SPYL have become?

€10,000 invested in SPYL at the start of 2025 grew to €10,471 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 4.7% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring SPYL or WEBN.

SXR8vsSPYLVUAAvsSPYLSPYLvsSPYYSPYLvsSPYISPYLvsVWCESPYLvsEUNLSPYLvsIUSQSPYLvsVGVF