Originave

SXR8 (CSPX) vs WEBN: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in euros — what you'd actually pocket buying on Xetra. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different: in 2025 a world tracker rose about 23% in dollars but only about 9% in euros, because the euro gained roughly 13% against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

Fund A
iShares logoSXR8
Fund B
Amundi logoWEBN

SXR8 tracks the S&P 500 IndexWEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index

What did the last 1 years do to €10,000?

You invest €10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 1 full years (2025–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.

SXR8 turned it into
€10,473
+4.73% per year on average · 2025–2025
WEBN turned it into
€10,970
+9.70% per year on average · 2025–2025
Difference
−€497
WEBN made more of the same money

SXR8 vs WEBN, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
3
where both funds were trading
SXR8 won
1
years
WEBN won
2
years
YearSXR8WEBNWinner
2026 (so far)+12.04%+13.37%WEBN
2025+4.73%+9.70%WEBN
2024+32.32%+6.17%SXR8
2023+22.47%——
2022-14.31%——
2021+40.74%——
2020+6.80%——
2019+34.49%——
2018-1.05%——
2017+6.67%——
2016+14.83%——
2015+12.52%——
2014+30.38%——
2013+27.45%——
2012+11.05%——
2011+4.85%——
2010-12.49%——

SXR8 vs WEBN in plain words

SXR8 tracks the S&P 500 Index while WEBN follows the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. Both funds charge 0.07% a year in running costs.

Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 3 calendar years both funds were trading, SXR8 finished the year ahead 1 times and WEBN 2 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2025 was worth €10,473 in SXR8 versus €10,970 in WEBN by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

CSPX is the London (USD) listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00B5BMR087 — SXR8 is its EUR line on Xetra.

Fund facts: SXR8 vs WEBN

FactSXR8WEBN
FundiShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF (Acc)
TracksS&P 500 IndexSolactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.07%0.07%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched19 May 20105 Jun 2024
ISINIE00B5BMR087IE0003XJA0J9
WKNA0YEDGETF151
Also trades asCSPX—

Frequently asked

Is SXR8 or WEBN better?

Across the 3 calendar years both funds were trading, SXR8 finished the year ahead 1 times and WEBN 2 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2025 was worth €10,473 in SXR8 versus €10,970 in WEBN by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between SXR8 and WEBN?

SXR8 tracks the S&P 500 Index while WEBN follows the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. Both funds charge 0.07% a year in running costs. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.

What would €10,000 in SXR8 have become?

€10,000 invested in SXR8 at the start of 2025 grew to €10,473 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 4.7% per year.

Is CSPX the same as SXR8?

CSPX is the London (USD) listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00B5BMR087 — SXR8 is its EUR line on Xetra.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring SXR8 or WEBN.

SXR8vsVUAASXR8vsSPYLSXR8vsSPYYSXR8vsSPYISXR8vsVWCESXR8vsEUNLSXR8vsIUSQSXR8vsVGVF