WEBN vs IS3S (IWVL): which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in euros — what you'd actually pocket buying on Xetra. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different: in 2025 a world tracker rose about 23% in dollars but only about 9% in euros, because the euro gained roughly 13% against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap IndexIS3S tracks the MSCI World Enhanced Value Index

What did the last 1 years do to €10,000?

You invest €10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 1 full years (2025–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.

WEBN turned it into
€10,970
+9.70% per year on average · 20252025
IS3S turned it into
€12,513
+25.13% per year on average · 20252025
Difference
−€1,543
IS3S made more of the same money

WEBN vs IS3S, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
3
where both funds were trading
WEBN won
0
years
IS3S won
3
years
YearWEBNIS3SWinner
2026 (so far)+13.37%+35.21%IS3S
2025+9.70%+25.13%IS3S
2024+6.17%+11.36%IS3S
2023+15.62%
2022-4.81%
2021+30.38%
2020-12.53%
2019+22.01%
2018-10.34%
2017+7.66%
2016+11.24%
2015+8.31%
2014-16.73%

WEBN vs IS3S in plain words

WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while IS3S follows the MSCI World Enhanced Value Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. WEBN charges 0.07% a year in running costs and IS3S charges 0.25% — WEBN is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 3 calendar years both funds were trading, WEBN finished the year ahead 0 times and IS3S 3 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2025 was worth €10,970 in WEBN versus €12,513 in IS3S by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

IWVL is the London (USD) listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00BP3QZB59 — IS3S is its EUR line on Xetra.

Fund facts: WEBN vs IS3S

FactWEBNIS3S
FundAmundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF (Acc)iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF
TracksSolactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap IndexMSCI World Enhanced Value Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.07%0.25%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched5 Jun 20243 Oct 2014
ISINIE0003XJA0J9IE00BP3QZB59
WKNETF151A12ATG
Also trades asIWVL

Frequently asked

Is WEBN or IS3S better?

Across the 3 calendar years both funds were trading, WEBN finished the year ahead 0 times and IS3S 3 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2025 was worth €10,970 in WEBN versus €12,513 in IS3S by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between WEBN and IS3S?

WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while IS3S follows the MSCI World Enhanced Value Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. WEBN charges 0.07% a year in running costs and IS3S charges 0.25% — WEBN is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.

What would €10,000 in WEBN have become?

€10,000 invested in WEBN at the start of 2025 grew to €10,970 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 9.7% per year.

Is IWVL the same as IS3S?

IWVL is the London (USD) listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00BP3QZB59 — IS3S is its EUR line on Xetra.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring WEBN or IS3S.