WEBN vs IUSQ (ISAC): which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in euros — what you'd actually pocket buying on Xetra. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different: in 2025 a world tracker rose about 23% in dollars but only about 9% in euros, because the euro gained roughly 13% against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap IndexIUSQ tracks the MSCI ACWI Index

What did the last 1 years do to €10,000?

You invest €10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 1 full years (2025–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.

WEBN turned it into
€10,970
+9.70% per year on average · 20252025
IUSQ turned it into
€10,902
+9.02% per year on average · 20252025
Difference
+€69
WEBN made more of the same money

WEBN vs IUSQ, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
3
where both funds were trading
WEBN won
1
years
IUSQ won
2
years
YearWEBNIUSQWinner
2026 (so far)+13.37%+13.66%IUSQ
2025+9.70%+9.02%WEBN
2024+6.17%+24.53%IUSQ
2023+18.57%
2022-13.58%
2021+29.13%
2020+4.94%
2019+30.14%
2018-5.97%
2017+9.14%
2016+10.88%
2015+8.31%
2014+19.02%
2013+17.43%
2012+3.09%
20110.00%

WEBN vs IUSQ in plain words

WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while IUSQ follows the MSCI ACWI Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. WEBN charges 0.07% a year in running costs and IUSQ charges 0.20% — WEBN is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 3 calendar years both funds were trading, WEBN finished the year ahead 1 times and IUSQ 2 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2025 was worth €10,970 in WEBN versus €10,902 in IUSQ by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

ISAC is the London (USD) listing and SSAC the London (GBP) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00B6R52259 — IUSQ is its EUR line on Xetra.

Fund facts: WEBN vs IUSQ

FactWEBNIUSQ
FundAmundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF (Acc)iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
TracksSolactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap IndexMSCI ACWI Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.07%0.20%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched5 Jun 202421 Oct 2011
ISINIE0003XJA0J9IE00B6R52259
WKNETF151A1JMDF
Also trades asISAC

Frequently asked

Is WEBN or IUSQ better?

Across the 3 calendar years both funds were trading, WEBN finished the year ahead 1 times and IUSQ 2 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2025 was worth €10,970 in WEBN versus €10,902 in IUSQ by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between WEBN and IUSQ?

WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while IUSQ follows the MSCI ACWI Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. WEBN charges 0.07% a year in running costs and IUSQ charges 0.20% — WEBN is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.

What would €10,000 in WEBN have become?

€10,000 invested in WEBN at the start of 2025 grew to €10,970 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 9.7% per year.

Is ISAC the same as IUSQ?

ISAC is the London (USD) listing and SSAC the London (GBP) line of the same fund, ISIN IE00B6R52259 — IUSQ is its EUR line on Xetra.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring WEBN or IUSQ.