WEBN vs IS3R (IWMO): which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in euros — what you'd actually pocket buying on Xetra. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different: in 2025 a world tracker rose about 23% in dollars but only about 9% in euros, because the euro gained roughly 13% against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap IndexIS3R tracks the MSCI World Momentum Index

What did the last 1 years do to €10,000?

You invest €10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 1 full years (2025–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.

WEBN turned it into
€10,970
+9.70% per year on average · 20252025
IS3R turned it into
€10,837
+8.37% per year on average · 20252025
Difference
+€133
WEBN made more of the same money

WEBN vs IS3R, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
3
where both funds were trading
WEBN won
1
years
IS3R won
2
years
YearWEBNIS3RWinner
2026 (so far)+13.37%+30.15%IS3R
2025+9.70%+8.37%WEBN
2024+6.17%+37.95%IS3R
2023+8.09%
2022-13.60%
2021+24.50%
2020+16.41%
2019+31.50%
2018+0.27%
2017+16.07%
2016+7.03%
2015+15.77%
2014-13.37%

WEBN vs IS3R in plain words

WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while IS3R follows the MSCI World Momentum Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. WEBN charges 0.07% a year in running costs and IS3R charges 0.25% — WEBN is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 3 calendar years both funds were trading, WEBN finished the year ahead 1 times and IS3R 2 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2025 was worth €10,970 in WEBN versus €10,837 in IS3R by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

IWMO is the London (USD) listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00BP3QZ825 — IS3R is its EUR line on Xetra.

Fund facts: WEBN vs IS3R

FactWEBNIS3R
FundAmundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF (Acc)iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF
TracksSolactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap IndexMSCI World Momentum Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.07%0.25%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched5 Jun 20243 Oct 2014
ISINIE0003XJA0J9IE00BP3QZ825
WKNETF151A12ATF
Also trades asIWMO

Frequently asked

Is WEBN or IS3R better?

Across the 3 calendar years both funds were trading, WEBN finished the year ahead 1 times and IS3R 2 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2025 was worth €10,970 in WEBN versus €10,837 in IS3R by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between WEBN and IS3R?

WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while IS3R follows the MSCI World Momentum Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. WEBN charges 0.07% a year in running costs and IS3R charges 0.25% — WEBN is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.

What would €10,000 in WEBN have become?

€10,000 invested in WEBN at the start of 2025 grew to €10,970 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 9.7% per year.

Is IWMO the same as IS3R?

IWMO is the London (USD) listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00BP3QZ825 — IS3R is its EUR line on Xetra.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring WEBN or IS3R.