Originave

VWCE (VWRA) vs WEBN: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in euros — what you'd actually pocket buying on Xetra. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different: in 2025 a world tracker rose about 23% in dollars but only about 9% in euros, because the euro gained roughly 13% against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

Fund A
Vanguard logoVWCE
Fund B
Amundi logoWEBN

VWCE tracks the FTSE All-World IndexWEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index

What did the last 1 years do to €10,000?

You invest €10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 1 full years (2025–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.

VWCE turned it into
€10,916
+9.16% per year on average · 2025–2025
WEBN turned it into
€10,970
+9.70% per year on average · 2025–2025
Difference
−€55
WEBN made more of the same money

VWCE vs WEBN, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
3
where both funds were trading
VWCE won
2
years
WEBN won
1
years
YearVWCEWEBNWinner
2026 (so far)+13.62%+13.37%VWCE
2025+9.16%+9.70%WEBN
2024+24.41%+6.17%VWCE
2023+18.18%——
2022-13.47%——
2021+28.62%——
2020+5.36%——
2019+7.56%——

VWCE vs WEBN in plain words

VWCE tracks the FTSE All-World Index while WEBN follows the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VWCE charges 0.19% a year in running costs and WEBN charges 0.07% — WEBN is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 3 calendar years both funds were trading, VWCE finished the year ahead 2 times and WEBN 1 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2025 was worth €10,916 in VWCE versus €10,970 in WEBN by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

VWRA (London, USD) and VWRP (London, GBP) are listings of the same accumulating share class, ISIN IE00BK5BQT80 — VWRL is its distributing sibling.

Fund facts: VWCE vs WEBN

FactVWCEWEBN
FundVanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (Acc)Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF (Acc)
TracksFTSE All-World IndexSolactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.19%0.07%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched23 Jul 20195 Jun 2024
ISINIE00BK5BQT80IE0003XJA0J9
WKNA2PKXGETF151
Also trades asVWRA—

Frequently asked

Is VWCE or WEBN better?

Across the 3 calendar years both funds were trading, VWCE finished the year ahead 2 times and WEBN 1 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2025 was worth €10,916 in VWCE versus €10,970 in WEBN by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between VWCE and WEBN?

VWCE tracks the FTSE All-World Index while WEBN follows the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VWCE charges 0.19% a year in running costs and WEBN charges 0.07% — WEBN is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.

What would €10,000 in VWCE have become?

€10,000 invested in VWCE at the start of 2025 grew to €10,916 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 9.2% per year.

Is VWRA the same as VWCE?

VWRA (London, USD) and VWRP (London, GBP) are listings of the same accumulating share class, ISIN IE00BK5BQT80 — VWRL is its distributing sibling.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring VWCE or WEBN.

SXR8vsVWCEVUAAvsVWCESPYLvsVWCESPYYvsVWCESPYIvsVWCEVWCEvsEUNLVWCEvsIUSQVWCEvsVGVF