WEBN vs EUNL (IWDA): which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in euros — what you'd actually pocket buying on Xetra. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different: in 2025 a world tracker rose about 23% in dollars but only about 9% in euros, because the euro gained roughly 13% against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap IndexEUNL tracks the MSCI World Index

What did the last 1 years do to €10,000?

You invest €10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 1 full years (2025–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.

WEBN turned it into
€10,970
+9.70% per year on average · 20252025
EUNL turned it into
€10,790
+7.90% per year on average · 20252025
Difference
+€180
WEBN made more of the same money

WEBN vs EUNL, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
3
where both funds were trading
WEBN won
2
years
EUNL won
1
years
YearWEBNEUNLWinner
2026 (so far)+13.37%+11.86%WEBN
2025+9.70%+7.90%WEBN
2024+6.17%+25.93%EUNL
2023+20.13%
2022-13.59%
2021+32.71%
2020+5.48%
2019+31.34%
2018-5.13%
2017+7.71%
2016+10.91%
2015+10.81%
2014+20.38%
2013+21.89%
2012+12.45%
2011-3.26%
2010+19.38%
2009+4.65%

WEBN vs EUNL in plain words

WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while EUNL follows the MSCI World Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. WEBN charges 0.07% a year in running costs and EUNL charges 0.20% — WEBN is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 3 calendar years both funds were trading, WEBN finished the year ahead 2 times and EUNL 1 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2025 was worth €10,970 in WEBN versus €10,790 in EUNL by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

IWDA (London/Amsterdam, USD) and SWDA (London, GBP) are listings of the same fund, ISIN IE00B4L5Y983 — EUNL is its EUR line on Xetra.

Fund facts: WEBN vs EUNL

FactWEBNEUNL
FundAmundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF (Acc)iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF (Acc)
TracksSolactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap IndexMSCI World Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.07%0.20%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched5 Jun 202425 Sept 2009
ISINIE0003XJA0J9IE00B4L5Y983
WKNETF151A0RPWH
Also trades asIWDA

Frequently asked

Is WEBN or EUNL better?

Across the 3 calendar years both funds were trading, WEBN finished the year ahead 2 times and EUNL 1 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2025 was worth €10,970 in WEBN versus €10,790 in EUNL by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between WEBN and EUNL?

WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while EUNL follows the MSCI World Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. WEBN charges 0.07% a year in running costs and EUNL charges 0.20% — WEBN is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.

What would €10,000 in WEBN have become?

€10,000 invested in WEBN at the start of 2025 grew to €10,970 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 9.7% per year.

Is IWDA the same as EUNL?

IWDA (London/Amsterdam, USD) and SWDA (London, GBP) are listings of the same fund, ISIN IE00B4L5Y983 — EUNL is its EUR line on Xetra.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring WEBN or EUNL.