Originave

WEBN vs VGWD: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in euros — what you'd actually pocket buying on Xetra. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different: in 2025 a world tracker rose about 23% in dollars but only about 9% in euros, because the euro gained roughly 13% against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

Fund A
Amundi logoWEBN
Fund B
Vanguard logoVGWD

WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap IndexVGWD tracks the FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index

What did the last 1 years do to €10,000?

You invest €10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 1 full years (2025–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.

WEBN turned it into
€10,970
+9.70% per year on average · 2025–2025
VGWD turned it into
€11,316
+13.16% per year on average · 2025–2025
Difference
−€346
VGWD made more of the same money

WEBN vs VGWD, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
3
where both funds were trading
WEBN won
0
years
VGWD won
3
years
YearWEBNVGWDWinner
2026 (so far)+13.37%+14.44%VGWD
2025+9.70%+13.16%VGWD
2024+6.17%+15.75%VGWD
2023—+7.29%—
2022—+0.08%—
2021—+27.90%—
2020—-9.60%—
2019—+25.03%—
2018—-8.03%—
2017—+0.41%—

WEBN vs VGWD in plain words

WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while VGWD follows the FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. WEBN charges 0.07% a year in running costs and VGWD charges 0.29% — WEBN is the cheaper fund to hold.

WEBN reinvests its dividends automatically (accumulating), while VGWD pays them out as cash (distributing). Across the 3 calendar years both funds were trading, WEBN finished the year ahead 0 times and VGWD 3 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2025 was worth €10,970 in WEBN versus €11,316 in VGWD by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

VHYL is the London (GBP) listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00B8GKDB10 — VGWD is its EUR line on Xetra.

Fund facts: WEBN vs VGWD

FactWEBNVGWD
FundAmundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF (Acc)Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF (Dist)
TracksSolactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap IndexFTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.07%0.29%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedDistributing — dividends paid out
Launched5 Jun 202421 May 2013
ISINIE0003XJA0J9IE00B8GKDB10
WKNETF151A1T8FV

Frequently asked

Is WEBN or VGWD better?

Across the 3 calendar years both funds were trading, WEBN finished the year ahead 0 times and VGWD 3 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2025 was worth €10,970 in WEBN versus €11,316 in VGWD by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between WEBN and VGWD?

WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while VGWD follows the FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. WEBN charges 0.07% a year in running costs and VGWD charges 0.29% — WEBN is the cheaper fund to hold. WEBN reinvests its dividends automatically (accumulating), while VGWD pays them out as cash (distributing).

What would €10,000 in WEBN have become?

€10,000 invested in WEBN at the start of 2025 grew to €10,970 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 9.7% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring WEBN or VGWD.

SXR8vsWEBNVUAAvsWEBNSPYLvsWEBNSPYYvsWEBNSPYIvsWEBNVWCEvsWEBNWEBNvsEUNLWEBNvsIUSQ