Originave

WEBN vs VGVF (VHVE): which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in euros — what you'd actually pocket buying on Xetra. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different: in 2025 a world tracker rose about 23% in dollars but only about 9% in euros, because the euro gained roughly 13% against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

Fund A
Amundi logoWEBN
Fund B
Vanguard logoVGVF

WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap IndexVGVF tracks the FTSE Developed World Index

What did the last 1 years do to €10,000?

You invest €10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 1 full years (2025–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.

WEBN turned it into
€10,970
+9.70% per year on average · 2025–2025
VGVF turned it into
€10,899
+8.99% per year on average · 2025–2025
Difference
+€71
WEBN made more of the same money

WEBN vs VGVF, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
3
where both funds were trading
WEBN won
1
years
VGVF won
2
years
YearWEBNVGVFWinner
2026 (so far)+13.37%+13.72%VGVF
2025+9.70%+8.99%WEBN
2024+6.17%+24.73%VGVF
2023—+20.35%—
2022—-13.58%—
2021—+31.62%—
2020—+2.32%—

WEBN vs VGVF in plain words

WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while VGVF follows the FTSE Developed World Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. WEBN charges 0.07% a year in running costs and VGVF charges 0.12% — WEBN is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 3 calendar years both funds were trading, WEBN finished the year ahead 1 times and VGVF 2 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2025 was worth €10,970 in WEBN versus €10,899 in VGVF by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

VHVE is the London (USD) listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00BK5BQV03 — VGVF is its EUR line on Xetra.

Fund facts: WEBN vs VGVF

FactWEBNVGVF
FundAmundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF (Acc)Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF (Acc)
TracksSolactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap IndexFTSE Developed World Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.07%0.12%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched5 Jun 202424 Sept 2019
ISINIE0003XJA0J9IE00BK5BQV03
WKNETF151A2PLS9
Also trades as—VHVE

Frequently asked

Is WEBN or VGVF better?

Across the 3 calendar years both funds were trading, WEBN finished the year ahead 1 times and VGVF 2 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2025 was worth €10,970 in WEBN versus €10,899 in VGVF by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between WEBN and VGVF?

WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while VGVF follows the FTSE Developed World Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. WEBN charges 0.07% a year in running costs and VGVF charges 0.12% — WEBN is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.

What would €10,000 in WEBN have become?

€10,000 invested in WEBN at the start of 2025 grew to €10,970 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 9.7% per year.

Is VHVE the same as VGVF?

VHVE is the London (USD) listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00BK5BQV03 — VGVF is its EUR line on Xetra.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring WEBN or VGVF.

SXR8vsWEBNVUAAvsWEBNSPYLvsWEBNSPYYvsWEBNSPYIvsWEBNVWCEvsWEBNWEBNvsEUNLWEBNvsIUSQ