WEBN vs IS3Q (IWQU): which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in euros — what you'd actually pocket buying on Xetra. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different: in 2025 a world tracker rose about 23% in dollars but only about 9% in euros, because the euro gained roughly 13% against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap IndexIS3Q tracks the MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index

What did the last 1 years do to €10,000?

You invest €10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 1 full years (2025–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.

WEBN turned it into
€10,970
+9.70% per year on average · 20252025
IS3Q turned it into
€10,280
+2.80% per year on average · 20252025
Difference
+€690
WEBN made more of the same money

WEBN vs IS3Q, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
3
where both funds were trading
WEBN won
2
years
IS3Q won
1
years
YearWEBNIS3QWinner
2026 (so far)+13.37%+12.44%WEBN
2025+9.70%+2.80%WEBN
2024+6.17%+23.78%IS3Q
2023+21.70%
2022-14.84%
2021+34.28%
2020+4.44%
2019+33.90%
2018-3.45%
2017+8.34%
2016+7.85%
2015+14.52%
2014-14.79%

WEBN vs IS3Q in plain words

WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while IS3Q follows the MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. WEBN charges 0.07% a year in running costs and IS3Q charges 0.25% — WEBN is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 3 calendar years both funds were trading, WEBN finished the year ahead 2 times and IS3Q 1 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2025 was worth €10,970 in WEBN versus €10,280 in IS3Q by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

IWQU is the London (USD) listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00BP3QZ601 — IS3Q is its EUR line on Xetra.

Fund facts: WEBN vs IS3Q

FactWEBNIS3Q
FundAmundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF (Acc)iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF
TracksSolactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap IndexMSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.07%0.25%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched5 Jun 20243 Oct 2014
ISINIE0003XJA0J9IE00BP3QZ601
WKNETF151A12ATE
Also trades asIWQU

Frequently asked

Is WEBN or IS3Q better?

Across the 3 calendar years both funds were trading, WEBN finished the year ahead 2 times and IS3Q 1 times. €10,000 invested at the start of 2025 was worth €10,970 in WEBN versus €10,280 in IS3Q by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between WEBN and IS3Q?

WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while IS3Q follows the MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. WEBN charges 0.07% a year in running costs and IS3Q charges 0.25% — WEBN is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.

What would €10,000 in WEBN have become?

€10,000 invested in WEBN at the start of 2025 grew to €10,970 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 9.7% per year.

Is IWQU the same as IS3Q?

IWQU is the London (USD) listing of the same fund, ISIN IE00BP3QZ601 — IS3Q is its EUR line on Xetra.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring WEBN or IS3Q.