WEBN vs DEGC: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

Every figure here is in euros — what you'd actually pocket buying on Xetra. Fund fact sheets usually headline returns in US dollars, which can look very different: in 2025 a world tracker rose about 23% in dollars but only about 9% in euros, because the euro gained roughly 13% against the dollar. Here's the full story, year by year.

Fund A
Fund B

WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index

WEBN vs DEGC, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
2
where both funds were trading
WEBN won
2
years
DEGC won
0
years
YearWEBNDEGCWinner
2026 (so far)+13.37%+12.65%WEBN
2025+9.70%+1.95%WEBN
2024+6.17%

WEBN vs DEGC in plain words

WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while DEGC follows the Dimensional Global Core Equity strategy, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. WEBN charges 0.07% a year in running costs and DEGC charges 0.26% — WEBN is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout. Across the 2 calendar years both funds were trading, WEBN finished the year ahead 2 times and DEGC 0 times.

Actively managed: it weights developed-market companies towards low valuations, high profitability and smaller size rather than following an index, and measures itself against the MSCI World.

Fund facts: WEBN vs DEGC

FactWEBNDEGC
FundAmundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF (Acc)Dimensional Global Core Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
TracksSolactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap IndexDimensional Global Core Equity strategy
Yearly cost (TER)0.07%0.26%
DividendsAccumulating — dividends reinvestedAccumulating — dividends reinvested
Launched5 Jun 202412 Nov 2025
ISINIE0003XJA0J9IE000EGGFVG6
WKNETF151A41E9T

Frequently asked

Is WEBN or DEGC better?

Across the 2 calendar years both funds were trading, WEBN finished the year ahead 2 times and DEGC 0 times. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between WEBN and DEGC?

WEBN tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while DEGC follows the Dimensional Global Core Equity strategy, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. WEBN charges 0.07% a year in running costs and DEGC charges 0.26% — WEBN is the cheaper fund to hold. Both are accumulating funds: dividends are reinvested inside the fund and show up as a higher share price, never as a payout.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring WEBN or DEGC.