VGT vs VUG: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

VGT tracks the MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 IndexVUG tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index

What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?

You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

VGT turned it into
$76,464
+22.56% per year on average · 20162025
VUG turned it into
$49,942
+17.45% per year on average · 20162025
Difference
+$26,522
VGT made more of the same money

VGT vs VUG, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
23
where both funds were trading
VGT won
14
years
VUG won
9
years
YearVGTVUGWinner
2026 (so far)+27.13%+6.18%VGT
2025+21.77%+19.40%VGT
2024+29.30%+32.69%VUG
2023+52.66%+46.83%VGT
2022-29.70%-33.16%VGT
2021+30.45%+27.35%VGT
2020+46.04%+40.25%VGT
2019+48.62%+37.03%VGT
2018+2.46%-3.32%VGT
2017+37.08%+27.72%VGT
2016+13.77%+6.27%VGT
2015+5.05%+3.24%VGT
2014+16.69%+13.61%VGT
2013+30.97%+32.48%VUG
2012+13.96%+17.01%VUG
2011+0.54%+1.82%VUG
2010+12.78%+17.22%VUG
2009+61.89%+36.14%VGT
2008-42.82%-38.02%VUG
2007+14.78%+12.52%VGT
2006+8.85%+9.19%VUG
2005+3.00%+5.02%VUG
2004-2.86%+4.99%VUG

VGT vs VUG in plain words

VGT tracks the MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index while VUG follows the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VGT charges 0.09% a year in running costs and VUG charges 0.03% — VUG is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 23 calendar years both funds were trading, VGT finished the year ahead 14 times and VUG 9 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $76,464 in VGT versus $49,942 in VUG by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

Fund facts: VGT vs VUG

FactVGTVUG
FundVanguard Information Technology ETFVanguard Growth ETF
TracksMSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 IndexCRSP US Large Cap Growth Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.09%0.03%
DividendsDistributing — dividends paid outDistributing — dividends paid out
Launched26 Jan 200426 Jan 2004

Frequently asked

Is VGT or VUG better?

Across the 23 calendar years both funds were trading, VGT finished the year ahead 14 times and VUG 9 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $76,464 in VGT versus $49,942 in VUG by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between VGT and VUG?

VGT tracks the MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index while VUG follows the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VGT charges 0.09% a year in running costs and VUG charges 0.03% — VUG is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.

What would $10,000 in VGT have become?

$10,000 invested in VGT at the start of 2016 grew to $76,464 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 22.6% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring VGT or VUG.