VTV vs VUG: which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
VTVtracks the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index
VUGtracks the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index
VTV tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Value IndexVUG tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index
What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?
You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.
VTV vs VUG, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | VTV | VUG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +15.30% | +6.18% | VTV |
| 2025 | +15.27% | +19.40% | VUG |
| 2024 | +15.95% | +32.69% | VUG |
| 2023 | +9.32% | +46.83% | VUG |
| 2022 | -2.09% | -33.16% | VTV |
| 2021 | +26.53% | +27.35% | VUG |
| 2020 | +2.33% | +40.25% | VUG |
| 2019 | +25.66% | +37.03% | VUG |
| 2018 | -5.47% | -3.32% | VUG |
| 2017 | +17.14% | +27.72% | VUG |
| 2016 | +17.10% | +6.27% | VTV |
| 2015 | -0.98% | +3.24% | VUG |
| 2014 | +13.17% | +13.61% | VUG |
| 2013 | +33.09% | +32.48% | VTV |
| 2012 | +15.18% | +17.01% | VUG |
| 2011 | +1.11% | +1.82% | VUG |
| 2010 | +14.54% | +17.22% | VUG |
| 2009 | +19.88% | +36.14% | VUG |
| 2008 | -35.89% | -38.02% | VTV |
| 2007 | -0.12% | +12.52% | VUG |
| 2006 | +22.38% | +9.19% | VTV |
| 2005 | +7.21% | +5.02% | VTV |
| 2004 | +13.85% | +4.99% | VTV |
VTV vs VUG in plain words
VTV tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index while VUG follows the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. Both funds charge 0.03% a year in running costs.
Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 23 calendar years both funds were trading, VTV finished the year ahead 8 times and VUG 15 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $30,183 in VTV versus $49,942 in VUG by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.
Fund facts: VTV vs VUG
| Fact | VTV | VUG |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Vanguard Value ETF | Vanguard Growth ETF |
| Tracks | CRSP US Large Cap Value Index | CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| Dividends | Distributing — dividends paid out | Distributing — dividends paid out |
| Launched | 26 Jan 2004 | 26 Jan 2004 |
Frequently asked
Is VTV or VUG better?
Across the 23 calendar years both funds were trading, VTV finished the year ahead 8 times and VUG 15 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $30,183 in VTV versus $49,942 in VUG by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between VTV and VUG?
VTV tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index while VUG follows the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. Both funds charge 0.03% a year in running costs. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.
What would $10,000 in VTV have become?
$10,000 invested in VTV at the start of 2016 grew to $30,183 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 11.7% per year.