VTV vs MTUM: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

VTV tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Value IndexMTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index

What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?

You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

VTV turned it into
$30,183
+11.68% per year on average · 20162025
MTUM turned it into
$38,506
+14.43% per year on average · 20162025
Difference
−$8,323
MTUM made more of the same money

VTV vs MTUM, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
14
where both funds were trading
VTV won
5
years
MTUM won
9
years
YearVTVMTUMWinner
2026 (so far)+15.30%+37.24%MTUM
2025+15.27%+22.15%MTUM
2024+15.95%+32.89%MTUM
2023+9.32%+9.15%VTV
2022-2.09%-18.27%VTV
2021+26.53%+13.36%VTV
2020+2.33%+29.86%MTUM
2019+25.66%+27.25%MTUM
2018-5.47%-1.67%MTUM
2017+17.14%+37.50%MTUM
2016+17.10%+5.00%VTV
2015-0.98%+8.91%MTUM
2014+13.17%+14.62%MTUM
2013+33.09%+19.21%VTV
2012+15.18%
2011+1.11%
2010+14.54%
2009+19.88%
2008-35.89%
2007-0.12%
2006+22.38%
2005+7.21%
2004+13.85%

VTV vs MTUM in plain words

VTV tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index while MTUM follows the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VTV charges 0.03% a year in running costs and MTUM charges 0.15% — VTV is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 14 calendar years both funds were trading, VTV finished the year ahead 5 times and MTUM 9 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $30,183 in VTV versus $38,506 in MTUM by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

Fund facts: VTV vs MTUM

FactVTVMTUM
FundVanguard Value ETFiShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
TracksCRSP US Large Cap Value IndexMSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.03%0.15%
DividendsDistributing — dividends paid outDistributing — dividends paid out
Launched26 Jan 200416 Apr 2013

Frequently asked

Is VTV or MTUM better?

Across the 14 calendar years both funds were trading, VTV finished the year ahead 5 times and MTUM 9 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $30,183 in VTV versus $38,506 in MTUM by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between VTV and MTUM?

VTV tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index while MTUM follows the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VTV charges 0.03% a year in running costs and MTUM charges 0.15% — VTV is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.

What would $10,000 in VTV have become?

$10,000 invested in VTV at the start of 2016 grew to $30,183 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 11.7% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring VTV or MTUM.