MTUM vs SPMO: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant IndexSPMO tracks the S&P 500 Momentum Index

What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?

You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

MTUM turned it into
$38,506
+14.43% per year on average · 20162025
SPMO turned it into
$51,975
+17.92% per year on average · 20162025
Difference
−$13,469
SPMO made more of the same money

MTUM vs SPMO, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
12
where both funds were trading
MTUM won
5
years
SPMO won
7
years
YearMTUMSPMOWinner
2026 (so far)+37.24%+35.98%MTUM
2025+22.15%+26.58%SPMO
2024+32.89%+45.82%SPMO
2023+9.15%+17.56%SPMO
2022-18.27%-10.45%SPMO
2021+13.36%+22.51%SPMO
2020+29.86%+27.80%MTUM
2019+27.25%+25.93%MTUM
2018-1.67%-0.92%SPMO
2017+37.50%+27.76%MTUM
2016+5.00%+7.18%SPMO
2015+8.91%+2.78%MTUM
2014+14.62%
2013+19.21%

MTUM vs SPMO in plain words

MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index while SPMO follows the S&P 500 Momentum Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. MTUM charges 0.15% a year in running costs and SPMO charges 0.13% — SPMO is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 12 calendar years both funds were trading, MTUM finished the year ahead 5 times and SPMO 7 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $38,506 in MTUM versus $51,975 in SPMO by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

Fund facts: MTUM vs SPMO

FactMTUMSPMO
FundiShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETFInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
TracksMSCI USA Momentum SR Variant IndexS&P 500 Momentum Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.15%0.13%
DividendsDistributing — dividends paid outDistributing — dividends paid out
Launched16 Apr 20139 Oct 2015

Frequently asked

Is MTUM or SPMO better?

Across the 12 calendar years both funds were trading, MTUM finished the year ahead 5 times and SPMO 7 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $38,506 in MTUM versus $51,975 in SPMO by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between MTUM and SPMO?

MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index while SPMO follows the S&P 500 Momentum Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. MTUM charges 0.15% a year in running costs and SPMO charges 0.13% — SPMO is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.

What would $10,000 in MTUM have become?

$10,000 invested in MTUM at the start of 2016 grew to $38,506 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 14.4% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring MTUM or SPMO.