URTH vs SPMO: which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
URTHtracks the MSCI World Index
SPMOtracks the S&P 500 Momentum Index
URTH tracks the MSCI World IndexSPMO tracks the S&P 500 Momentum Index
What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?
You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.
URTH vs SPMO, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | URTH | SPMO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +9.81% | +35.98% | SPMO |
| 2025 | +21.36% | +26.58% | SPMO |
| 2024 | +18.66% | +45.82% | SPMO |
| 2023 | +23.95% | +17.56% | URTH |
| 2022 | -17.97% | -10.45% | SPMO |
| 2021 | +22.27% | +22.51% | SPMO |
| 2020 | +15.78% | +27.80% | SPMO |
| 2019 | +28.15% | +25.93% | URTH |
| 2018 | -8.56% | -0.92% | SPMO |
| 2017 | +22.95% | +27.76% | SPMO |
| 2016 | +7.31% | +7.18% | URTH |
| 2015 | -0.64% | +2.78% | SPMO |
| 2014 | +4.37% | — | — |
| 2013 | +26.66% | — | — |
| 2012 | +14.71% | — | — |
URTH vs SPMO in plain words
URTH tracks the MSCI World Index while SPMO follows the S&P 500 Momentum Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. URTH charges 0.24% a year in running costs and SPMO charges 0.13% — SPMO is the cheaper fund to hold.
Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 12 calendar years both funds were trading, URTH finished the year ahead 3 times and SPMO 9 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $32,044 in URTH versus $51,975 in SPMO by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.
Fund facts: URTH vs SPMO
| Fact | URTH | SPMO |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | iShares MSCI World ETF | Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF |
| Tracks | MSCI World Index | S&P 500 Momentum Index |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.13% |
| Dividends | Distributing — dividends paid out | Distributing — dividends paid out |
| Launched | 10 Jan 2012 | 9 Oct 2015 |
Frequently asked
Is URTH or SPMO better?
Across the 12 calendar years both funds were trading, URTH finished the year ahead 3 times and SPMO 9 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $32,044 in URTH versus $51,975 in SPMO by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between URTH and SPMO?
URTH tracks the MSCI World Index while SPMO follows the S&P 500 Momentum Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. URTH charges 0.24% a year in running costs and SPMO charges 0.13% — SPMO is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.
What would $10,000 in URTH have become?
$10,000 invested in URTH at the start of 2016 grew to $32,044 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 12.4% per year.
Related comparisons
More head-to-heads featuring URTH or SPMO.