URTH vs SPMO: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

URTH tracks the MSCI World IndexSPMO tracks the S&P 500 Momentum Index

What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?

You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

URTH turned it into
$32,044
+12.35% per year on average · 20162025
SPMO turned it into
$51,975
+17.92% per year on average · 20162025
Difference
−$19,931
SPMO made more of the same money

URTH vs SPMO, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
12
where both funds were trading
URTH won
3
years
SPMO won
9
years
YearURTHSPMOWinner
2026 (so far)+9.81%+35.98%SPMO
2025+21.36%+26.58%SPMO
2024+18.66%+45.82%SPMO
2023+23.95%+17.56%URTH
2022-17.97%-10.45%SPMO
2021+22.27%+22.51%SPMO
2020+15.78%+27.80%SPMO
2019+28.15%+25.93%URTH
2018-8.56%-0.92%SPMO
2017+22.95%+27.76%SPMO
2016+7.31%+7.18%URTH
2015-0.64%+2.78%SPMO
2014+4.37%
2013+26.66%
2012+14.71%

URTH vs SPMO in plain words

URTH tracks the MSCI World Index while SPMO follows the S&P 500 Momentum Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. URTH charges 0.24% a year in running costs and SPMO charges 0.13% — SPMO is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 12 calendar years both funds were trading, URTH finished the year ahead 3 times and SPMO 9 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $32,044 in URTH versus $51,975 in SPMO by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

Fund facts: URTH vs SPMO

FactURTHSPMO
FundiShares MSCI World ETFInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
TracksMSCI World IndexS&P 500 Momentum Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.24%0.13%
DividendsDistributing — dividends paid outDistributing — dividends paid out
Launched10 Jan 20129 Oct 2015

Frequently asked

Is URTH or SPMO better?

Across the 12 calendar years both funds were trading, URTH finished the year ahead 3 times and SPMO 9 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $32,044 in URTH versus $51,975 in SPMO by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between URTH and SPMO?

URTH tracks the MSCI World Index while SPMO follows the S&P 500 Momentum Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. URTH charges 0.24% a year in running costs and SPMO charges 0.13% — SPMO is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.

What would $10,000 in URTH have become?

$10,000 invested in URTH at the start of 2016 grew to $32,044 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 12.4% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring URTH or SPMO.