VT vs URTH: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

VT tracks the FTSE Global All Cap IndexURTH tracks the MSCI World Index

What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?

You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

VT turned it into
$30,414
+11.77% per year on average · 20162025
URTH turned it into
$32,044
+12.35% per year on average · 20162025
Difference
−$1,630
URTH made more of the same money

VT vs URTH, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
15
where both funds were trading
VT won
6
years
URTH won
9
years
YearVTURTHWinner
2026 (so far)+11.93%+9.81%VT
2025+22.43%+21.36%VT
2024+16.49%+18.66%URTH
2023+22.02%+23.95%URTH
2022-18.00%-17.97%URTH
2021+18.27%+22.27%URTH
2020+16.59%+15.78%VT
2019+26.81%+28.15%URTH
2018-9.76%-8.56%URTH
2017+24.50%+22.95%VT
2016+8.50%+7.31%VT
2015-1.86%-0.64%URTH
2014+3.68%+4.37%URTH
2013+22.94%+26.66%URTH
2012+17.12%+14.71%VT
2011-7.51%
2010+13.08%
2009+32.66%
2008-33.05%

VT vs URTH in plain words

VT tracks the FTSE Global All Cap Index while URTH follows the MSCI World Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VT charges 0.06% a year in running costs and URTH charges 0.24% — VT is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 15 calendar years both funds were trading, VT finished the year ahead 6 times and URTH 9 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $30,414 in VT versus $32,044 in URTH by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

Fund facts: VT vs URTH

FactVTURTH
FundVanguard Total World Stock ETFiShares MSCI World ETF
TracksFTSE Global All Cap IndexMSCI World Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.06%0.24%
DividendsDistributing — dividends paid outDistributing — dividends paid out
Launched24 Jun 200810 Jan 2012

Frequently asked

Is VT or URTH better?

Across the 15 calendar years both funds were trading, VT finished the year ahead 6 times and URTH 9 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $30,414 in VT versus $32,044 in URTH by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between VT and URTH?

VT tracks the FTSE Global All Cap Index while URTH follows the MSCI World Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VT charges 0.06% a year in running costs and URTH charges 0.24% — VT is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.

What would $10,000 in VT have become?

$10,000 invested in VT at the start of 2016 grew to $30,414 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 11.8% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring VT or URTH.