QQQM vs VT: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100 IndexVT tracks the FTSE Global All Cap Index

What did the last 5 years do to $10,000?

You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 5 full years (2021–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.

QQQM turned it into
$20,250
+15.16% per year on average · 20212025
VT turned it into
$16,877
+11.03% per year on average · 20212025
Difference
+$3,373
QQQM made more of the same money

QQQM vs VT, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
7
where both funds were trading
QQQM won
4
years
VT won
3
years
YearQQQMVTWinner
2026 (so far)+20.09%+11.93%QQQM
2025+20.85%+22.43%VT
2024+25.68%+16.49%QQQM
2023+55.01%+22.02%QQQM
2022-32.52%-18.00%VT
2021+27.45%+18.27%QQQM
2020+6.67%+16.59%VT
2019+26.81%
2018-9.76%
2017+24.50%
2016+8.50%
2015-1.86%
2014+3.68%
2013+22.94%
2012+17.12%
2011-7.51%
2010+13.08%
2009+32.66%
2008-33.05%

QQQM vs VT in plain words

QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index while VT follows the FTSE Global All Cap Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. QQQM charges 0.15% a year in running costs and VT charges 0.06% — VT is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 7 calendar years both funds were trading, QQQM finished the year ahead 4 times and VT 3 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2021 was worth $20,250 in QQQM versus $16,877 in VT by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

Fund facts: QQQM vs VT

FactQQQMVT
FundInvesco NASDAQ 100 ETFVanguard Total World Stock ETF
TracksNasdaq-100 IndexFTSE Global All Cap Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.15%0.06%
DividendsDistributing — dividends paid outDistributing — dividends paid out
Launched13 Oct 202024 Jun 2008

Frequently asked

Is QQQM or VT better?

Across the 7 calendar years both funds were trading, QQQM finished the year ahead 4 times and VT 3 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2021 was worth $20,250 in QQQM versus $16,877 in VT by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between QQQM and VT?

QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index while VT follows the FTSE Global All Cap Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. QQQM charges 0.15% a year in running costs and VT charges 0.06% — VT is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.

What would $10,000 in QQQM have become?

$10,000 invested in QQQM at the start of 2021 grew to $20,250 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 15.2% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring QQQM or VT.