VTI vs QQQM: which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
VTItracks the CRSP US Total Market Index
QQQMtracks the Nasdaq-100 Index
VTI tracks the CRSP US Total Market IndexQQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index
What did the last 5 years do to $10,000?
You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 5 full years (2021–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.
VTI vs QQQM, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | VTI | QQQM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +11.04% | +20.09% | QQQM |
| 2025 | +17.10% | +20.85% | QQQM |
| 2024 | +23.81% | +25.68% | QQQM |
| 2023 | +26.05% | +55.01% | QQQM |
| 2022 | -19.52% | -32.52% | VTI |
| 2021 | +25.68% | +27.45% | QQQM |
| 2020 | +21.08% | +6.67% | VTI |
| 2019 | +30.67% | — | — |
| 2018 | -5.23% | — | — |
| 2017 | +21.21% | — | — |
| 2016 | +12.82% | — | — |
| 2015 | +0.36% | — | — |
| 2014 | +12.55% | — | — |
| 2013 | +33.45% | — | — |
| 2012 | +16.45% | — | — |
| 2011 | +0.97% | — | — |
| 2010 | +17.43% | — | — |
| 2009 | +28.90% | — | — |
| 2008 | -36.99% | — | — |
| 2007 | +5.37% | — | — |
| 2006 | +15.70% | — | — |
| 2005 | +6.30% | — | — |
| 2004 | +12.78% | — | — |
| 2003 | +30.74% | — | — |
| 2002 | -20.48% | — | — |
| 2001 | -4.40% | — | — |
VTI vs QQQM in plain words
VTI tracks the CRSP US Total Market Index while QQQM follows the Nasdaq-100 Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VTI charges 0.03% a year in running costs and QQQM charges 0.15% — VTI is the cheaper fund to hold.
Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 7 calendar years both funds were trading, VTI finished the year ahead 2 times and QQQM 5 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2021 was worth $18,483 in VTI versus $20,250 in QQQM by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.
Fund facts: VTI vs QQQM
| Fact | VTI | QQQM |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF |
| Tracks | CRSP US Total Market Index | Nasdaq-100 Index |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.15% |
| Dividends | Distributing — dividends paid out | Distributing — dividends paid out |
| Launched | 24 May 2001 | 13 Oct 2020 |
Frequently asked
Is VTI or QQQM better?
Across the 7 calendar years both funds were trading, VTI finished the year ahead 2 times and QQQM 5 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2021 was worth $18,483 in VTI versus $20,250 in QQQM by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between VTI and QQQM?
VTI tracks the CRSP US Total Market Index while QQQM follows the Nasdaq-100 Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VTI charges 0.03% a year in running costs and QQQM charges 0.15% — VTI is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.
What would $10,000 in VTI have become?
$10,000 invested in VTI at the start of 2021 grew to $18,483 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 13.1% per year.