VTI vs SCHG: which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
VTItracks the CRSP US Total Market Index
SCHGtracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index
VTI tracks the CRSP US Total Market IndexSCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index
What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?
You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.
VTI vs SCHG, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | VTI | SCHG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +11.04% | +3.97% | VTI |
| 2025 | +17.10% | +17.50% | SCHG |
| 2024 | +23.81% | +34.96% | SCHG |
| 2023 | +26.05% | +50.11% | SCHG |
| 2022 | -19.52% | -31.80% | VTI |
| 2021 | +25.68% | +28.12% | SCHG |
| 2020 | +21.08% | +39.14% | SCHG |
| 2019 | +30.67% | +36.02% | SCHG |
| 2018 | -5.23% | -1.36% | SCHG |
| 2017 | +21.21% | +28.05% | SCHG |
| 2016 | +12.82% | +6.55% | VTI |
| 2015 | +0.36% | +3.24% | SCHG |
| 2014 | +12.55% | +15.80% | SCHG |
| 2013 | +33.45% | +34.04% | SCHG |
| 2012 | +16.45% | +16.89% | SCHG |
| 2011 | +0.97% | -0.74% | VTI |
| 2010 | +17.43% | +14.92% | VTI |
| 2009 | +28.90% | — | — |
| 2008 | -36.99% | — | — |
| 2007 | +5.37% | — | — |
| 2006 | +15.70% | — | — |
| 2005 | +6.30% | — | — |
| 2004 | +12.78% | — | — |
| 2003 | +30.74% | — | — |
| 2002 | -20.48% | — | — |
| 2001 | -4.40% | — | — |
VTI vs SCHG in plain words
VTI tracks the CRSP US Total Market Index while SCHG follows the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VTI charges 0.03% a year in running costs and SCHG charges 0.04% — VTI is the cheaper fund to hold.
Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 17 calendar years both funds were trading, VTI finished the year ahead 5 times and SCHG 12 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $37,896 in VTI versus $52,975 in SCHG by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.
Fund facts: VTI vs SCHG
| Fact | VTI | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF |
| Tracks | CRSP US Total Market Index | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.04% |
| Dividends | Distributing — dividends paid out | Distributing — dividends paid out |
| Launched | 24 May 2001 | 11 Dec 2009 |
Frequently asked
Is VTI or SCHG better?
Across the 17 calendar years both funds were trading, VTI finished the year ahead 5 times and SCHG 12 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $37,896 in VTI versus $52,975 in SCHG by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between VTI and SCHG?
VTI tracks the CRSP US Total Market Index while SCHG follows the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VTI charges 0.03% a year in running costs and SCHG charges 0.04% — VTI is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.
What would $10,000 in VTI have become?
$10,000 invested in VTI at the start of 2016 grew to $37,896 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 14.3% per year.