VTI vs SCHG: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

VTI tracks the CRSP US Total Market IndexSCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index

What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?

You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

VTI turned it into
$37,896
+14.25% per year on average · 20162025
SCHG turned it into
$52,975
+18.14% per year on average · 20162025
Difference
−$15,080
SCHG made more of the same money

VTI vs SCHG, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
17
where both funds were trading
VTI won
5
years
SCHG won
12
years
YearVTISCHGWinner
2026 (so far)+11.04%+3.97%VTI
2025+17.10%+17.50%SCHG
2024+23.81%+34.96%SCHG
2023+26.05%+50.11%SCHG
2022-19.52%-31.80%VTI
2021+25.68%+28.12%SCHG
2020+21.08%+39.14%SCHG
2019+30.67%+36.02%SCHG
2018-5.23%-1.36%SCHG
2017+21.21%+28.05%SCHG
2016+12.82%+6.55%VTI
2015+0.36%+3.24%SCHG
2014+12.55%+15.80%SCHG
2013+33.45%+34.04%SCHG
2012+16.45%+16.89%SCHG
2011+0.97%-0.74%VTI
2010+17.43%+14.92%VTI
2009+28.90%
2008-36.99%
2007+5.37%
2006+15.70%
2005+6.30%
2004+12.78%
2003+30.74%
2002-20.48%
2001-4.40%

VTI vs SCHG in plain words

VTI tracks the CRSP US Total Market Index while SCHG follows the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VTI charges 0.03% a year in running costs and SCHG charges 0.04% — VTI is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 17 calendar years both funds were trading, VTI finished the year ahead 5 times and SCHG 12 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $37,896 in VTI versus $52,975 in SCHG by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

Fund facts: VTI vs SCHG

FactVTISCHG
FundVanguard Total Stock Market ETFSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
TracksCRSP US Total Market IndexDow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.03%0.04%
DividendsDistributing — dividends paid outDistributing — dividends paid out
Launched24 May 200111 Dec 2009

Frequently asked

Is VTI or SCHG better?

Across the 17 calendar years both funds were trading, VTI finished the year ahead 5 times and SCHG 12 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $37,896 in VTI versus $52,975 in SCHG by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between VTI and SCHG?

VTI tracks the CRSP US Total Market Index while SCHG follows the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VTI charges 0.03% a year in running costs and SCHG charges 0.04% — VTI is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.

What would $10,000 in VTI have become?

$10,000 invested in VTI at the start of 2016 grew to $37,896 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 14.3% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring VTI or SCHG.