SCHG vs VT: which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
SCHGtracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index
VTtracks the FTSE Global All Cap Index
SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market IndexVT tracks the FTSE Global All Cap Index
What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?
You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.
SCHG vs VT, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | SCHG | VT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +3.97% | +11.93% | VT |
| 2025 | +17.50% | +22.43% | VT |
| 2024 | +34.96% | +16.49% | SCHG |
| 2023 | +50.11% | +22.02% | SCHG |
| 2022 | -31.80% | -18.00% | VT |
| 2021 | +28.12% | +18.27% | SCHG |
| 2020 | +39.14% | +16.59% | SCHG |
| 2019 | +36.02% | +26.81% | SCHG |
| 2018 | -1.36% | -9.76% | SCHG |
| 2017 | +28.05% | +24.50% | SCHG |
| 2016 | +6.55% | +8.50% | VT |
| 2015 | +3.24% | -1.86% | SCHG |
| 2014 | +15.80% | +3.68% | SCHG |
| 2013 | +34.04% | +22.94% | SCHG |
| 2012 | +16.89% | +17.12% | VT |
| 2011 | -0.74% | -7.51% | SCHG |
| 2010 | +14.92% | +13.08% | SCHG |
| 2009 | — | +32.66% | — |
| 2008 | — | -33.05% | — |
SCHG vs VT in plain words
SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index while VT follows the FTSE Global All Cap Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SCHG charges 0.04% a year in running costs and VT charges 0.06% — SCHG is the cheaper fund to hold.
Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 17 calendar years both funds were trading, SCHG finished the year ahead 12 times and VT 5 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $52,975 in SCHG versus $30,414 in VT by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.
Fund facts: SCHG vs VT
| Fact | SCHG | VT |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | Vanguard Total World Stock ETF |
| Tracks | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index | FTSE Global All Cap Index |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.04% | 0.06% |
| Dividends | Distributing — dividends paid out | Distributing — dividends paid out |
| Launched | 11 Dec 2009 | 24 Jun 2008 |
Frequently asked
Is SCHG or VT better?
Across the 17 calendar years both funds were trading, SCHG finished the year ahead 12 times and VT 5 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $52,975 in SCHG versus $30,414 in VT by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between SCHG and VT?
SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index while VT follows the FTSE Global All Cap Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SCHG charges 0.04% a year in running costs and VT charges 0.06% — SCHG is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.
What would $10,000 in SCHG have become?
$10,000 invested in SCHG at the start of 2016 grew to $52,975 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 18.1% per year.
Related comparisons
More head-to-heads featuring SCHG or VT.