VT vs SPHQ: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

VT tracks the FTSE Global All Cap IndexSPHQ tracks the S&P 500 Quality Index

What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?

You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

VT turned it into
$30,414
+11.77% per year on average · 20162025
SPHQ turned it into
$37,666
+14.18% per year on average · 20162025
Difference
−$7,252
SPHQ made more of the same money

VT vs SPHQ, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
19
where both funds were trading
VT won
5
years
SPHQ won
14
years
YearVTSPHQWinner
2026 (so far)+11.93%+20.79%SPHQ
2025+22.43%+13.25%VT
2024+16.49%+25.44%SPHQ
2023+22.02%+24.83%SPHQ
2022-18.00%-15.76%SPHQ
2021+18.27%+27.59%SPHQ
2020+16.59%+16.93%SPHQ
2019+26.81%+33.63%SPHQ
2018-9.76%-7.09%SPHQ
2017+24.50%+19.10%VT
2016+8.50%+14.30%SPHQ
2015-1.86%+1.64%SPHQ
2014+3.68%+16.08%SPHQ
2013+22.94%+32.73%SPHQ
2012+17.12%+14.32%VT
2011-7.51%+6.28%SPHQ
2010+13.08%+20.50%SPHQ
2009+32.66%+12.59%VT
2008-33.05%-46.35%VT
2007+16.77%
2006+4.58%
2005-2.05%

VT vs SPHQ in plain words

VT tracks the FTSE Global All Cap Index while SPHQ follows the S&P 500 Quality Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VT charges 0.06% a year in running costs and SPHQ charges 0.15% — VT is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 19 calendar years both funds were trading, VT finished the year ahead 5 times and SPHQ 14 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $30,414 in VT versus $37,666 in SPHQ by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

Fund facts: VT vs SPHQ

FactVTSPHQ
FundVanguard Total World Stock ETFInvesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
TracksFTSE Global All Cap IndexS&P 500 Quality Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.06%0.15%
DividendsDistributing — dividends paid outDistributing — dividends paid out
Launched24 Jun 20086 Dec 2005

Frequently asked

Is VT or SPHQ better?

Across the 19 calendar years both funds were trading, VT finished the year ahead 5 times and SPHQ 14 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $30,414 in VT versus $37,666 in SPHQ by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between VT and SPHQ?

VT tracks the FTSE Global All Cap Index while SPHQ follows the S&P 500 Quality Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VT charges 0.06% a year in running costs and SPHQ charges 0.15% — VT is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.

What would $10,000 in VT have become?

$10,000 invested in VT at the start of 2016 grew to $30,414 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 11.8% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring VT or SPHQ.