VT vs SPHQ: which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
VTtracks the FTSE Global All Cap Index
SPHQtracks the S&P 500 Quality Index
VT tracks the FTSE Global All Cap IndexSPHQ tracks the S&P 500 Quality Index
What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?
You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.
VT vs SPHQ, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | VT | SPHQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +11.93% | +20.79% | SPHQ |
| 2025 | +22.43% | +13.25% | VT |
| 2024 | +16.49% | +25.44% | SPHQ |
| 2023 | +22.02% | +24.83% | SPHQ |
| 2022 | -18.00% | -15.76% | SPHQ |
| 2021 | +18.27% | +27.59% | SPHQ |
| 2020 | +16.59% | +16.93% | SPHQ |
| 2019 | +26.81% | +33.63% | SPHQ |
| 2018 | -9.76% | -7.09% | SPHQ |
| 2017 | +24.50% | +19.10% | VT |
| 2016 | +8.50% | +14.30% | SPHQ |
| 2015 | -1.86% | +1.64% | SPHQ |
| 2014 | +3.68% | +16.08% | SPHQ |
| 2013 | +22.94% | +32.73% | SPHQ |
| 2012 | +17.12% | +14.32% | VT |
| 2011 | -7.51% | +6.28% | SPHQ |
| 2010 | +13.08% | +20.50% | SPHQ |
| 2009 | +32.66% | +12.59% | VT |
| 2008 | -33.05% | -46.35% | VT |
| 2007 | — | +16.77% | — |
| 2006 | — | +4.58% | — |
| 2005 | — | -2.05% | — |
VT vs SPHQ in plain words
VT tracks the FTSE Global All Cap Index while SPHQ follows the S&P 500 Quality Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VT charges 0.06% a year in running costs and SPHQ charges 0.15% — VT is the cheaper fund to hold.
Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 19 calendar years both funds were trading, VT finished the year ahead 5 times and SPHQ 14 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $30,414 in VT versus $37,666 in SPHQ by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.
Fund facts: VT vs SPHQ
| Fact | VT | SPHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF |
| Tracks | FTSE Global All Cap Index | S&P 500 Quality Index |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.06% | 0.15% |
| Dividends | Distributing — dividends paid out | Distributing — dividends paid out |
| Launched | 24 Jun 2008 | 6 Dec 2005 |
Frequently asked
Is VT or SPHQ better?
Across the 19 calendar years both funds were trading, VT finished the year ahead 5 times and SPHQ 14 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $30,414 in VT versus $37,666 in SPHQ by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between VT and SPHQ?
VT tracks the FTSE Global All Cap Index while SPHQ follows the S&P 500 Quality Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VT charges 0.06% a year in running costs and SPHQ charges 0.15% — VT is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.
What would $10,000 in VT have become?
$10,000 invested in VT at the start of 2016 grew to $30,414 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 11.8% per year.