URTH vs SPHQ: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

URTH tracks the MSCI World IndexSPHQ tracks the S&P 500 Quality Index

What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?

You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

URTH turned it into
$32,044
+12.35% per year on average · 20162025
SPHQ turned it into
$37,666
+14.18% per year on average · 20162025
Difference
−$5,622
SPHQ made more of the same money

URTH vs SPHQ, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
15
where both funds were trading
URTH won
3
years
SPHQ won
12
years
YearURTHSPHQWinner
2026 (so far)+9.81%+20.79%SPHQ
2025+21.36%+13.25%URTH
2024+18.66%+25.44%SPHQ
2023+23.95%+24.83%SPHQ
2022-17.97%-15.76%SPHQ
2021+22.27%+27.59%SPHQ
2020+15.78%+16.93%SPHQ
2019+28.15%+33.63%SPHQ
2018-8.56%-7.09%SPHQ
2017+22.95%+19.10%URTH
2016+7.31%+14.30%SPHQ
2015-0.64%+1.64%SPHQ
2014+4.37%+16.08%SPHQ
2013+26.66%+32.73%SPHQ
2012+14.71%+14.32%URTH
2011+6.28%
2010+20.50%
2009+12.59%
2008-46.35%
2007+16.77%
2006+4.58%
2005-2.05%

URTH vs SPHQ in plain words

URTH tracks the MSCI World Index while SPHQ follows the S&P 500 Quality Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. URTH charges 0.24% a year in running costs and SPHQ charges 0.15% — SPHQ is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 15 calendar years both funds were trading, URTH finished the year ahead 3 times and SPHQ 12 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $32,044 in URTH versus $37,666 in SPHQ by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

Fund facts: URTH vs SPHQ

FactURTHSPHQ
FundiShares MSCI World ETFInvesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
TracksMSCI World IndexS&P 500 Quality Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.24%0.15%
DividendsDistributing — dividends paid outDistributing — dividends paid out
Launched10 Jan 20126 Dec 2005

Frequently asked

Is URTH or SPHQ better?

Across the 15 calendar years both funds were trading, URTH finished the year ahead 3 times and SPHQ 12 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $32,044 in URTH versus $37,666 in SPHQ by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between URTH and SPHQ?

URTH tracks the MSCI World Index while SPHQ follows the S&P 500 Quality Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. URTH charges 0.24% a year in running costs and SPHQ charges 0.15% — SPHQ is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.

What would $10,000 in URTH have become?

$10,000 invested in URTH at the start of 2016 grew to $32,044 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 12.4% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring URTH or SPHQ.