URTH vs VTV: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

URTH tracks the MSCI World IndexVTV tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index

What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?

You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

URTH turned it into
$32,044
+12.35% per year on average · 20162025
VTV turned it into
$30,183
+11.68% per year on average · 20162025
Difference
+$1,862
URTH made more of the same money

URTH vs VTV, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
15
where both funds were trading
URTH won
7
years
VTV won
8
years
YearURTHVTVWinner
2026 (so far)+9.81%+15.30%VTV
2025+21.36%+15.27%URTH
2024+18.66%+15.95%URTH
2023+23.95%+9.32%URTH
2022-17.97%-2.09%VTV
2021+22.27%+26.53%VTV
2020+15.78%+2.33%URTH
2019+28.15%+25.66%URTH
2018-8.56%-5.47%VTV
2017+22.95%+17.14%URTH
2016+7.31%+17.10%VTV
2015-0.64%-0.98%URTH
2014+4.37%+13.17%VTV
2013+26.66%+33.09%VTV
2012+14.71%+15.18%VTV
2011+1.11%
2010+14.54%
2009+19.88%
2008-35.89%
2007-0.12%
2006+22.38%
2005+7.21%
2004+13.85%

URTH vs VTV in plain words

URTH tracks the MSCI World Index while VTV follows the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. URTH charges 0.24% a year in running costs and VTV charges 0.03% — VTV is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 15 calendar years both funds were trading, URTH finished the year ahead 7 times and VTV 8 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $32,044 in URTH versus $30,183 in VTV by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

Fund facts: URTH vs VTV

FactURTHVTV
FundiShares MSCI World ETFVanguard Value ETF
TracksMSCI World IndexCRSP US Large Cap Value Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.24%0.03%
DividendsDistributing — dividends paid outDistributing — dividends paid out
Launched10 Jan 201226 Jan 2004

Frequently asked

Is URTH or VTV better?

Across the 15 calendar years both funds were trading, URTH finished the year ahead 7 times and VTV 8 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $32,044 in URTH versus $30,183 in VTV by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between URTH and VTV?

URTH tracks the MSCI World Index while VTV follows the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. URTH charges 0.24% a year in running costs and VTV charges 0.03% — VTV is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.

What would $10,000 in URTH have become?

$10,000 invested in URTH at the start of 2016 grew to $32,044 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 12.4% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring URTH or VTV.