VTV vs SPMO: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

VTV tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Value IndexSPMO tracks the S&P 500 Momentum Index

What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?

You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

VTV turned it into
$30,183
+11.68% per year on average · 20162025
SPMO turned it into
$51,975
+17.92% per year on average · 20162025
Difference
−$21,792
SPMO made more of the same money

VTV vs SPMO, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
12
where both funds were trading
VTV won
3
years
SPMO won
9
years
YearVTVSPMOWinner
2026 (so far)+15.30%+35.98%SPMO
2025+15.27%+26.58%SPMO
2024+15.95%+45.82%SPMO
2023+9.32%+17.56%SPMO
2022-2.09%-10.45%VTV
2021+26.53%+22.51%VTV
2020+2.33%+27.80%SPMO
2019+25.66%+25.93%SPMO
2018-5.47%-0.92%SPMO
2017+17.14%+27.76%SPMO
2016+17.10%+7.18%VTV
2015-0.98%+2.78%SPMO
2014+13.17%
2013+33.09%
2012+15.18%
2011+1.11%
2010+14.54%
2009+19.88%
2008-35.89%
2007-0.12%
2006+22.38%
2005+7.21%
2004+13.85%

VTV vs SPMO in plain words

VTV tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index while SPMO follows the S&P 500 Momentum Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VTV charges 0.03% a year in running costs and SPMO charges 0.13% — VTV is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 12 calendar years both funds were trading, VTV finished the year ahead 3 times and SPMO 9 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $30,183 in VTV versus $51,975 in SPMO by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

Fund facts: VTV vs SPMO

FactVTVSPMO
FundVanguard Value ETFInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
TracksCRSP US Large Cap Value IndexS&P 500 Momentum Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.03%0.13%
DividendsDistributing — dividends paid outDistributing — dividends paid out
Launched26 Jan 20049 Oct 2015

Frequently asked

Is VTV or SPMO better?

Across the 12 calendar years both funds were trading, VTV finished the year ahead 3 times and SPMO 9 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $30,183 in VTV versus $51,975 in SPMO by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between VTV and SPMO?

VTV tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index while SPMO follows the S&P 500 Momentum Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VTV charges 0.03% a year in running costs and SPMO charges 0.13% — VTV is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.

What would $10,000 in VTV have become?

$10,000 invested in VTV at the start of 2016 grew to $30,183 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 11.7% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring VTV or SPMO.