VTV vs SPMO: which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
VTVtracks the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index
SPMOtracks the S&P 500 Momentum Index
VTV tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Value IndexSPMO tracks the S&P 500 Momentum Index
What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?
You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.
VTV vs SPMO, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | VTV | SPMO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +15.30% | +35.98% | SPMO |
| 2025 | +15.27% | +26.58% | SPMO |
| 2024 | +15.95% | +45.82% | SPMO |
| 2023 | +9.32% | +17.56% | SPMO |
| 2022 | -2.09% | -10.45% | VTV |
| 2021 | +26.53% | +22.51% | VTV |
| 2020 | +2.33% | +27.80% | SPMO |
| 2019 | +25.66% | +25.93% | SPMO |
| 2018 | -5.47% | -0.92% | SPMO |
| 2017 | +17.14% | +27.76% | SPMO |
| 2016 | +17.10% | +7.18% | VTV |
| 2015 | -0.98% | +2.78% | SPMO |
| 2014 | +13.17% | — | — |
| 2013 | +33.09% | — | — |
| 2012 | +15.18% | — | — |
| 2011 | +1.11% | — | — |
| 2010 | +14.54% | — | — |
| 2009 | +19.88% | — | — |
| 2008 | -35.89% | — | — |
| 2007 | -0.12% | — | — |
| 2006 | +22.38% | — | — |
| 2005 | +7.21% | — | — |
| 2004 | +13.85% | — | — |
VTV vs SPMO in plain words
VTV tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index while SPMO follows the S&P 500 Momentum Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VTV charges 0.03% a year in running costs and SPMO charges 0.13% — VTV is the cheaper fund to hold.
Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 12 calendar years both funds were trading, VTV finished the year ahead 3 times and SPMO 9 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $30,183 in VTV versus $51,975 in SPMO by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.
Fund facts: VTV vs SPMO
| Fact | VTV | SPMO |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Vanguard Value ETF | Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF |
| Tracks | CRSP US Large Cap Value Index | S&P 500 Momentum Index |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.13% |
| Dividends | Distributing — dividends paid out | Distributing — dividends paid out |
| Launched | 26 Jan 2004 | 9 Oct 2015 |
Frequently asked
Is VTV or SPMO better?
Across the 12 calendar years both funds were trading, VTV finished the year ahead 3 times and SPMO 9 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $30,183 in VTV versus $51,975 in SPMO by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between VTV and SPMO?
VTV tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index while SPMO follows the S&P 500 Momentum Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VTV charges 0.03% a year in running costs and SPMO charges 0.13% — VTV is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.
What would $10,000 in VTV have become?
$10,000 invested in VTV at the start of 2016 grew to $30,183 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 11.7% per year.