IVV vs SPMO: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

IVV tracks the S&P 500 IndexSPMO tracks the S&P 500 Momentum Index

What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?

You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

IVV turned it into
$39,497
+14.72% per year on average · 20162025
SPMO turned it into
$51,975
+17.92% per year on average · 20162025
Difference
−$12,478
SPMO made more of the same money

IVV vs SPMO, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
12
where both funds were trading
IVV won
4
years
SPMO won
8
years
YearIVVSPMOWinner
2026 (so far)+9.92%+35.98%SPMO
2025+17.85%+26.58%SPMO
2024+24.93%+45.82%SPMO
2023+26.31%+17.56%IVV
2022-18.16%-10.45%SPMO
2021+28.76%+22.51%IVV
2020+18.40%+27.80%SPMO
2019+31.25%+25.93%IVV
2018-4.49%-0.92%SPMO
2017+21.75%+27.76%SPMO
2016+11.54%+7.18%IVV
2015+1.28%+2.78%SPMO
2014+13.57%
2013+32.31%
2012+16.06%
2011+1.88%
2010+15.10%
2009+26.61%
2008-37.01%
2007+5.29%
2006+15.94%
2005+4.87%
2004+10.79%
2003+28.46%
2002-21.53%
2001-11.96%
2000-6.08%

IVV vs SPMO in plain words

IVV tracks the S&P 500 Index while SPMO follows the S&P 500 Momentum Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. IVV charges 0.03% a year in running costs and SPMO charges 0.13% — IVV is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 12 calendar years both funds were trading, IVV finished the year ahead 4 times and SPMO 8 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $39,497 in IVV versus $51,975 in SPMO by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

Fund facts: IVV vs SPMO

FactIVVSPMO
FundiShares Core S&P 500 ETFInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
TracksS&P 500 IndexS&P 500 Momentum Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.03%0.13%
DividendsDistributing — dividends paid outDistributing — dividends paid out
Launched15 May 20009 Oct 2015

Frequently asked

Is IVV or SPMO better?

Across the 12 calendar years both funds were trading, IVV finished the year ahead 4 times and SPMO 8 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $39,497 in IVV versus $51,975 in SPMO by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between IVV and SPMO?

IVV tracks the S&P 500 Index while SPMO follows the S&P 500 Momentum Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. IVV charges 0.03% a year in running costs and SPMO charges 0.13% — IVV is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.

What would $10,000 in IVV have become?

$10,000 invested in IVV at the start of 2016 grew to $39,497 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 14.7% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring IVV or SPMO.