IVV vs SPMO: which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
IVVtracks the S&P 500 Index
SPMOtracks the S&P 500 Momentum Index
IVV tracks the S&P 500 IndexSPMO tracks the S&P 500 Momentum Index
What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?
You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.
IVV vs SPMO, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | IVV | SPMO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +9.92% | +35.98% | SPMO |
| 2025 | +17.85% | +26.58% | SPMO |
| 2024 | +24.93% | +45.82% | SPMO |
| 2023 | +26.31% | +17.56% | IVV |
| 2022 | -18.16% | -10.45% | SPMO |
| 2021 | +28.76% | +22.51% | IVV |
| 2020 | +18.40% | +27.80% | SPMO |
| 2019 | +31.25% | +25.93% | IVV |
| 2018 | -4.49% | -0.92% | SPMO |
| 2017 | +21.75% | +27.76% | SPMO |
| 2016 | +11.54% | +7.18% | IVV |
| 2015 | +1.28% | +2.78% | SPMO |
| 2014 | +13.57% | — | — |
| 2013 | +32.31% | — | — |
| 2012 | +16.06% | — | — |
| 2011 | +1.88% | — | — |
| 2010 | +15.10% | — | — |
| 2009 | +26.61% | — | — |
| 2008 | -37.01% | — | — |
| 2007 | +5.29% | — | — |
| 2006 | +15.94% | — | — |
| 2005 | +4.87% | — | — |
| 2004 | +10.79% | — | — |
| 2003 | +28.46% | — | — |
| 2002 | -21.53% | — | — |
| 2001 | -11.96% | — | — |
| 2000 | -6.08% | — | — |
IVV vs SPMO in plain words
IVV tracks the S&P 500 Index while SPMO follows the S&P 500 Momentum Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. IVV charges 0.03% a year in running costs and SPMO charges 0.13% — IVV is the cheaper fund to hold.
Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 12 calendar years both funds were trading, IVV finished the year ahead 4 times and SPMO 8 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $39,497 in IVV versus $51,975 in SPMO by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.
Fund facts: IVV vs SPMO
| Fact | IVV | SPMO |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF |
| Tracks | S&P 500 Index | S&P 500 Momentum Index |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.13% |
| Dividends | Distributing — dividends paid out | Distributing — dividends paid out |
| Launched | 15 May 2000 | 9 Oct 2015 |
Frequently asked
Is IVV or SPMO better?
Across the 12 calendar years both funds were trading, IVV finished the year ahead 4 times and SPMO 8 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $39,497 in IVV versus $51,975 in SPMO by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between IVV and SPMO?
IVV tracks the S&P 500 Index while SPMO follows the S&P 500 Momentum Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. IVV charges 0.03% a year in running costs and SPMO charges 0.13% — IVV is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.
What would $10,000 in IVV have become?
$10,000 invested in IVV at the start of 2016 grew to $39,497 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 14.7% per year.