VUG vs SPMO: which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
VUGtracks the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index
SPMOtracks the S&P 500 Momentum Index
VUG tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Growth IndexSPMO tracks the S&P 500 Momentum Index
What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?
You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.
VUG vs SPMO, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | VUG | SPMO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +6.18% | +35.98% | SPMO |
| 2025 | +19.40% | +26.58% | SPMO |
| 2024 | +32.69% | +45.82% | SPMO |
| 2023 | +46.83% | +17.56% | VUG |
| 2022 | -33.16% | -10.45% | SPMO |
| 2021 | +27.35% | +22.51% | VUG |
| 2020 | +40.25% | +27.80% | VUG |
| 2019 | +37.03% | +25.93% | VUG |
| 2018 | -3.32% | -0.92% | SPMO |
| 2017 | +27.72% | +27.76% | SPMO |
| 2016 | +6.27% | +7.18% | SPMO |
| 2015 | +3.24% | +2.78% | VUG |
| 2014 | +13.61% | — | — |
| 2013 | +32.48% | — | — |
| 2012 | +17.01% | — | — |
| 2011 | +1.82% | — | — |
| 2010 | +17.22% | — | — |
| 2009 | +36.14% | — | — |
| 2008 | -38.02% | — | — |
| 2007 | +12.52% | — | — |
| 2006 | +9.19% | — | — |
| 2005 | +5.02% | — | — |
| 2004 | +4.99% | — | — |
VUG vs SPMO in plain words
VUG tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index while SPMO follows the S&P 500 Momentum Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VUG charges 0.03% a year in running costs and SPMO charges 0.13% — VUG is the cheaper fund to hold.
Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 12 calendar years both funds were trading, VUG finished the year ahead 5 times and SPMO 7 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $49,942 in VUG versus $51,975 in SPMO by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.
Fund facts: VUG vs SPMO
| Fact | VUG | SPMO |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Vanguard Growth ETF | Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF |
| Tracks | CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index | S&P 500 Momentum Index |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.13% |
| Dividends | Distributing — dividends paid out | Distributing — dividends paid out |
| Launched | 26 Jan 2004 | 9 Oct 2015 |
Frequently asked
Is VUG or SPMO better?
Across the 12 calendar years both funds were trading, VUG finished the year ahead 5 times and SPMO 7 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $49,942 in VUG versus $51,975 in SPMO by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between VUG and SPMO?
VUG tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index while SPMO follows the S&P 500 Momentum Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VUG charges 0.03% a year in running costs and SPMO charges 0.13% — VUG is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.
What would $10,000 in VUG have become?
$10,000 invested in VUG at the start of 2016 grew to $49,942 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 17.4% per year.