SPMO vs SPHQ: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

SPMO tracks the S&P 500 Momentum IndexSPHQ tracks the S&P 500 Quality Index

What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?

You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

SPMO turned it into
$51,975
+17.92% per year on average · 20162025
SPHQ turned it into
$37,666
+14.18% per year on average · 20162025
Difference
+$14,309
SPMO made more of the same money

SPMO vs SPHQ, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
12
where both funds were trading
SPMO won
8
years
SPHQ won
4
years
YearSPMOSPHQWinner
2026 (so far)+35.98%+20.79%SPMO
2025+26.58%+13.25%SPMO
2024+45.82%+25.44%SPMO
2023+17.56%+24.83%SPHQ
2022-10.45%-15.76%SPMO
2021+22.51%+27.59%SPHQ
2020+27.80%+16.93%SPMO
2019+25.93%+33.63%SPHQ
2018-0.92%-7.09%SPMO
2017+27.76%+19.10%SPMO
2016+7.18%+14.30%SPHQ
2015+2.78%+1.64%SPMO
2014+16.08%
2013+32.73%
2012+14.32%
2011+6.28%
2010+20.50%
2009+12.59%
2008-46.35%
2007+16.77%
2006+4.58%
2005-2.05%

SPMO vs SPHQ in plain words

SPMO tracks the S&P 500 Momentum Index while SPHQ follows the S&P 500 Quality Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SPMO charges 0.13% a year in running costs and SPHQ charges 0.15% — SPMO is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 12 calendar years both funds were trading, SPMO finished the year ahead 8 times and SPHQ 4 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $51,975 in SPMO versus $37,666 in SPHQ by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

Fund facts: SPMO vs SPHQ

FactSPMOSPHQ
FundInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETFInvesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
TracksS&P 500 Momentum IndexS&P 500 Quality Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.13%0.15%
DividendsDistributing — dividends paid outDistributing — dividends paid out
Launched9 Oct 20156 Dec 2005

Frequently asked

Is SPMO or SPHQ better?

Across the 12 calendar years both funds were trading, SPMO finished the year ahead 8 times and SPHQ 4 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $51,975 in SPMO versus $37,666 in SPHQ by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between SPMO and SPHQ?

SPMO tracks the S&P 500 Momentum Index while SPHQ follows the S&P 500 Quality Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SPMO charges 0.13% a year in running costs and SPHQ charges 0.15% — SPMO is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.

What would $10,000 in SPMO have become?

$10,000 invested in SPMO at the start of 2016 grew to $51,975 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 17.9% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring SPMO or SPHQ.