ACWI vs SPHQ: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

ACWI tracks the MSCI ACWI IndexSPHQ tracks the S&P 500 Quality Index

What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?

You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

ACWI turned it into
$30,708
+11.87% per year on average · 20162025
SPHQ turned it into
$37,666
+14.18% per year on average · 20162025
Difference
−$6,958
SPHQ made more of the same money

ACWI vs SPHQ, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
19
where both funds were trading
ACWI won
5
years
SPHQ won
14
years
YearACWISPHQWinner
2026 (so far)+11.66%+20.79%SPHQ
2025+22.41%+13.25%ACWI
2024+17.45%+25.44%SPHQ
2023+22.27%+24.83%SPHQ
2022-18.39%-15.76%SPHQ
2021+18.66%+27.59%SPHQ
2020+16.34%+16.93%SPHQ
2019+26.59%+33.63%SPHQ
2018-9.12%-7.09%SPHQ
2017+24.33%+19.10%ACWI
2016+8.40%+14.30%SPHQ
2015-2.21%+1.64%SPHQ
2014+3.83%+16.08%SPHQ
2013+22.38%+32.73%SPHQ
2012+16.75%+14.32%ACWI
2011-7.82%+6.28%SPHQ
2010+12.78%+20.50%SPHQ
2009+32.36%+12.59%ACWI
2008-35.29%-46.35%ACWI
2007+16.77%
2006+4.58%
2005-2.05%

ACWI vs SPHQ in plain words

ACWI tracks the MSCI ACWI Index while SPHQ follows the S&P 500 Quality Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. ACWI charges 0.32% a year in running costs and SPHQ charges 0.15% — SPHQ is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 19 calendar years both funds were trading, ACWI finished the year ahead 5 times and SPHQ 14 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $30,708 in ACWI versus $37,666 in SPHQ by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

Fund facts: ACWI vs SPHQ

FactACWISPHQ
FundiShares MSCI ACWI ETFInvesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
TracksMSCI ACWI IndexS&P 500 Quality Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.32%0.15%
DividendsDistributing — dividends paid outDistributing — dividends paid out
Launched26 Mar 20086 Dec 2005

Frequently asked

Is ACWI or SPHQ better?

Across the 19 calendar years both funds were trading, ACWI finished the year ahead 5 times and SPHQ 14 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $30,708 in ACWI versus $37,666 in SPHQ by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between ACWI and SPHQ?

ACWI tracks the MSCI ACWI Index while SPHQ follows the S&P 500 Quality Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. ACWI charges 0.32% a year in running costs and SPHQ charges 0.15% — SPHQ is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.

What would $10,000 in ACWI have become?

$10,000 invested in ACWI at the start of 2016 grew to $30,708 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 11.9% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring ACWI or SPHQ.