ACWI vs MTUM: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

ACWI tracks the MSCI ACWI IndexMTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index

What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?

You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

ACWI turned it into
$30,708
+11.87% per year on average · 20162025
MTUM turned it into
$38,506
+14.43% per year on average · 20162025
Difference
−$7,798
MTUM made more of the same money

ACWI vs MTUM, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
14
where both funds were trading
ACWI won
5
years
MTUM won
9
years
YearACWIMTUMWinner
2026 (so far)+11.66%+37.24%MTUM
2025+22.41%+22.15%ACWI
2024+17.45%+32.89%MTUM
2023+22.27%+9.15%ACWI
2022-18.39%-18.27%MTUM
2021+18.66%+13.36%ACWI
2020+16.34%+29.86%MTUM
2019+26.59%+27.25%MTUM
2018-9.12%-1.67%MTUM
2017+24.33%+37.50%MTUM
2016+8.40%+5.00%ACWI
2015-2.21%+8.91%MTUM
2014+3.83%+14.62%MTUM
2013+22.38%+19.21%ACWI
2012+16.75%
2011-7.82%
2010+12.78%
2009+32.36%
2008-35.29%

ACWI vs MTUM in plain words

ACWI tracks the MSCI ACWI Index while MTUM follows the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. ACWI charges 0.32% a year in running costs and MTUM charges 0.15% — MTUM is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 14 calendar years both funds were trading, ACWI finished the year ahead 5 times and MTUM 9 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $30,708 in ACWI versus $38,506 in MTUM by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

Fund facts: ACWI vs MTUM

FactACWIMTUM
FundiShares MSCI ACWI ETFiShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
TracksMSCI ACWI IndexMSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.32%0.15%
DividendsDistributing — dividends paid outDistributing — dividends paid out
Launched26 Mar 200816 Apr 2013

Frequently asked

Is ACWI or MTUM better?

Across the 14 calendar years both funds were trading, ACWI finished the year ahead 5 times and MTUM 9 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $30,708 in ACWI versus $38,506 in MTUM by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between ACWI and MTUM?

ACWI tracks the MSCI ACWI Index while MTUM follows the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. ACWI charges 0.32% a year in running costs and MTUM charges 0.15% — MTUM is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.

What would $10,000 in ACWI have become?

$10,000 invested in ACWI at the start of 2016 grew to $30,708 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 11.9% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring ACWI or MTUM.