ACWI vs SPMO: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

ACWI tracks the MSCI ACWI IndexSPMO tracks the S&P 500 Momentum Index

What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?

You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

ACWI turned it into
$30,708
+11.87% per year on average · 20162025
SPMO turned it into
$51,975
+17.92% per year on average · 20162025
Difference
−$21,267
SPMO made more of the same money

ACWI vs SPMO, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
12
where both funds were trading
ACWI won
3
years
SPMO won
9
years
YearACWISPMOWinner
2026 (so far)+11.66%+35.98%SPMO
2025+22.41%+26.58%SPMO
2024+17.45%+45.82%SPMO
2023+22.27%+17.56%ACWI
2022-18.39%-10.45%SPMO
2021+18.66%+22.51%SPMO
2020+16.34%+27.80%SPMO
2019+26.59%+25.93%ACWI
2018-9.12%-0.92%SPMO
2017+24.33%+27.76%SPMO
2016+8.40%+7.18%ACWI
2015-2.21%+2.78%SPMO
2014+3.83%
2013+22.38%
2012+16.75%
2011-7.82%
2010+12.78%
2009+32.36%
2008-35.29%

ACWI vs SPMO in plain words

ACWI tracks the MSCI ACWI Index while SPMO follows the S&P 500 Momentum Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. ACWI charges 0.32% a year in running costs and SPMO charges 0.13% — SPMO is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 12 calendar years both funds were trading, ACWI finished the year ahead 3 times and SPMO 9 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $30,708 in ACWI versus $51,975 in SPMO by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

Fund facts: ACWI vs SPMO

FactACWISPMO
FundiShares MSCI ACWI ETFInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
TracksMSCI ACWI IndexS&P 500 Momentum Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.32%0.13%
DividendsDistributing — dividends paid outDistributing — dividends paid out
Launched26 Mar 20089 Oct 2015

Frequently asked

Is ACWI or SPMO better?

Across the 12 calendar years both funds were trading, ACWI finished the year ahead 3 times and SPMO 9 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $30,708 in ACWI versus $51,975 in SPMO by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between ACWI and SPMO?

ACWI tracks the MSCI ACWI Index while SPMO follows the S&P 500 Momentum Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. ACWI charges 0.32% a year in running costs and SPMO charges 0.13% — SPMO is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.

What would $10,000 in ACWI have become?

$10,000 invested in ACWI at the start of 2016 grew to $30,708 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 11.9% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring ACWI or SPMO.