ACWI vs SPMO: which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
ACWItracks the MSCI ACWI Index
SPMOtracks the S&P 500 Momentum Index
ACWI tracks the MSCI ACWI IndexSPMO tracks the S&P 500 Momentum Index
What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?
You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.
ACWI vs SPMO, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | ACWI | SPMO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +11.66% | +35.98% | SPMO |
| 2025 | +22.41% | +26.58% | SPMO |
| 2024 | +17.45% | +45.82% | SPMO |
| 2023 | +22.27% | +17.56% | ACWI |
| 2022 | -18.39% | -10.45% | SPMO |
| 2021 | +18.66% | +22.51% | SPMO |
| 2020 | +16.34% | +27.80% | SPMO |
| 2019 | +26.59% | +25.93% | ACWI |
| 2018 | -9.12% | -0.92% | SPMO |
| 2017 | +24.33% | +27.76% | SPMO |
| 2016 | +8.40% | +7.18% | ACWI |
| 2015 | -2.21% | +2.78% | SPMO |
| 2014 | +3.83% | — | — |
| 2013 | +22.38% | — | — |
| 2012 | +16.75% | — | — |
| 2011 | -7.82% | — | — |
| 2010 | +12.78% | — | — |
| 2009 | +32.36% | — | — |
| 2008 | -35.29% | — | — |
ACWI vs SPMO in plain words
ACWI tracks the MSCI ACWI Index while SPMO follows the S&P 500 Momentum Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. ACWI charges 0.32% a year in running costs and SPMO charges 0.13% — SPMO is the cheaper fund to hold.
Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 12 calendar years both funds were trading, ACWI finished the year ahead 3 times and SPMO 9 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $30,708 in ACWI versus $51,975 in SPMO by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.
Fund facts: ACWI vs SPMO
| Fact | ACWI | SPMO |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF |
| Tracks | MSCI ACWI Index | S&P 500 Momentum Index |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.32% | 0.13% |
| Dividends | Distributing — dividends paid out | Distributing — dividends paid out |
| Launched | 26 Mar 2008 | 9 Oct 2015 |
Frequently asked
Is ACWI or SPMO better?
Across the 12 calendar years both funds were trading, ACWI finished the year ahead 3 times and SPMO 9 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $30,708 in ACWI versus $51,975 in SPMO by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between ACWI and SPMO?
ACWI tracks the MSCI ACWI Index while SPMO follows the S&P 500 Momentum Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. ACWI charges 0.32% a year in running costs and SPMO charges 0.13% — SPMO is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.
What would $10,000 in ACWI have become?
$10,000 invested in ACWI at the start of 2016 grew to $30,708 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 11.9% per year.
Related comparisons
More head-to-heads featuring ACWI or SPMO.