SCHG vs ACWI: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market IndexACWI tracks the MSCI ACWI Index

What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?

You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

SCHG turned it into
$52,975
+18.14% per year on average · 20162025
ACWI turned it into
$30,708
+11.87% per year on average · 20162025
Difference
+$22,267
SCHG made more of the same money

SCHG vs ACWI, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
17
where both funds were trading
SCHG won
13
years
ACWI won
4
years
YearSCHGACWIWinner
2026 (so far)+3.97%+11.66%ACWI
2025+17.50%+22.41%ACWI
2024+34.96%+17.45%SCHG
2023+50.11%+22.27%SCHG
2022-31.80%-18.39%ACWI
2021+28.12%+18.66%SCHG
2020+39.14%+16.34%SCHG
2019+36.02%+26.59%SCHG
2018-1.36%-9.12%SCHG
2017+28.05%+24.33%SCHG
2016+6.55%+8.40%ACWI
2015+3.24%-2.21%SCHG
2014+15.80%+3.83%SCHG
2013+34.04%+22.38%SCHG
2012+16.89%+16.75%SCHG
2011-0.74%-7.82%SCHG
2010+14.92%+12.78%SCHG
2009+32.36%
2008-35.29%

SCHG vs ACWI in plain words

SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index while ACWI follows the MSCI ACWI Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SCHG charges 0.04% a year in running costs and ACWI charges 0.32% — SCHG is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 17 calendar years both funds were trading, SCHG finished the year ahead 13 times and ACWI 4 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $52,975 in SCHG versus $30,708 in ACWI by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

Fund facts: SCHG vs ACWI

FactSCHGACWI
FundSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETFiShares MSCI ACWI ETF
TracksDow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market IndexMSCI ACWI Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.04%0.32%
DividendsDistributing — dividends paid outDistributing — dividends paid out
Launched11 Dec 200926 Mar 2008

Frequently asked

Is SCHG or ACWI better?

Across the 17 calendar years both funds were trading, SCHG finished the year ahead 13 times and ACWI 4 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $52,975 in SCHG versus $30,708 in ACWI by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between SCHG and ACWI?

SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index while ACWI follows the MSCI ACWI Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SCHG charges 0.04% a year in running costs and ACWI charges 0.32% — SCHG is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.

What would $10,000 in SCHG have become?

$10,000 invested in SCHG at the start of 2016 grew to $52,975 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 18.1% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring SCHG or ACWI.