SCHG vs VTV: which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
SCHGtracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index
VTVtracks the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index
SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market IndexVTV tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index
What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?
You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.
SCHG vs VTV, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | SCHG | VTV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +3.97% | +15.30% | VTV |
| 2025 | +17.50% | +15.27% | SCHG |
| 2024 | +34.96% | +15.95% | SCHG |
| 2023 | +50.11% | +9.32% | SCHG |
| 2022 | -31.80% | -2.09% | VTV |
| 2021 | +28.12% | +26.53% | SCHG |
| 2020 | +39.14% | +2.33% | SCHG |
| 2019 | +36.02% | +25.66% | SCHG |
| 2018 | -1.36% | -5.47% | SCHG |
| 2017 | +28.05% | +17.14% | SCHG |
| 2016 | +6.55% | +17.10% | VTV |
| 2015 | +3.24% | -0.98% | SCHG |
| 2014 | +15.80% | +13.17% | SCHG |
| 2013 | +34.04% | +33.09% | SCHG |
| 2012 | +16.89% | +15.18% | SCHG |
| 2011 | -0.74% | +1.11% | VTV |
| 2010 | +14.92% | +14.54% | SCHG |
| 2009 | — | +19.88% | — |
| 2008 | — | -35.89% | — |
| 2007 | — | -0.12% | — |
| 2006 | — | +22.38% | — |
| 2005 | — | +7.21% | — |
| 2004 | — | +13.85% | — |
SCHG vs VTV in plain words
SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index while VTV follows the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SCHG charges 0.04% a year in running costs and VTV charges 0.03% — VTV is the cheaper fund to hold.
Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 17 calendar years both funds were trading, SCHG finished the year ahead 13 times and VTV 4 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $52,975 in SCHG versus $30,183 in VTV by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.
Fund facts: SCHG vs VTV
| Fact | SCHG | VTV |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | Vanguard Value ETF |
| Tracks | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index | CRSP US Large Cap Value Index |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.04% | 0.03% |
| Dividends | Distributing — dividends paid out | Distributing — dividends paid out |
| Launched | 11 Dec 2009 | 26 Jan 2004 |
Frequently asked
Is SCHG or VTV better?
Across the 17 calendar years both funds were trading, SCHG finished the year ahead 13 times and VTV 4 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $52,975 in SCHG versus $30,183 in VTV by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between SCHG and VTV?
SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index while VTV follows the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SCHG charges 0.04% a year in running costs and VTV charges 0.03% — VTV is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.
What would $10,000 in SCHG have become?
$10,000 invested in SCHG at the start of 2016 grew to $52,975 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 18.1% per year.
Related comparisons
More head-to-heads featuring SCHG or VTV.