SCHG vs VTV: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market IndexVTV tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index

What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?

You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

SCHG turned it into
$52,975
+18.14% per year on average · 20162025
VTV turned it into
$30,183
+11.68% per year on average · 20162025
Difference
+$22,793
SCHG made more of the same money

SCHG vs VTV, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
17
where both funds were trading
SCHG won
13
years
VTV won
4
years
YearSCHGVTVWinner
2026 (so far)+3.97%+15.30%VTV
2025+17.50%+15.27%SCHG
2024+34.96%+15.95%SCHG
2023+50.11%+9.32%SCHG
2022-31.80%-2.09%VTV
2021+28.12%+26.53%SCHG
2020+39.14%+2.33%SCHG
2019+36.02%+25.66%SCHG
2018-1.36%-5.47%SCHG
2017+28.05%+17.14%SCHG
2016+6.55%+17.10%VTV
2015+3.24%-0.98%SCHG
2014+15.80%+13.17%SCHG
2013+34.04%+33.09%SCHG
2012+16.89%+15.18%SCHG
2011-0.74%+1.11%VTV
2010+14.92%+14.54%SCHG
2009+19.88%
2008-35.89%
2007-0.12%
2006+22.38%
2005+7.21%
2004+13.85%

SCHG vs VTV in plain words

SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index while VTV follows the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SCHG charges 0.04% a year in running costs and VTV charges 0.03% — VTV is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 17 calendar years both funds were trading, SCHG finished the year ahead 13 times and VTV 4 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $52,975 in SCHG versus $30,183 in VTV by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

Fund facts: SCHG vs VTV

FactSCHGVTV
FundSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETFVanguard Value ETF
TracksDow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market IndexCRSP US Large Cap Value Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.04%0.03%
DividendsDistributing — dividends paid outDistributing — dividends paid out
Launched11 Dec 200926 Jan 2004

Frequently asked

Is SCHG or VTV better?

Across the 17 calendar years both funds were trading, SCHG finished the year ahead 13 times and VTV 4 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $52,975 in SCHG versus $30,183 in VTV by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between SCHG and VTV?

SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index while VTV follows the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SCHG charges 0.04% a year in running costs and VTV charges 0.03% — VTV is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.

What would $10,000 in SCHG have become?

$10,000 invested in SCHG at the start of 2016 grew to $52,975 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 18.1% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring SCHG or VTV.