VGT vs VTV: which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
VGTtracks the MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index
VTVtracks the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index
VGT tracks the MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 IndexVTV tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index
What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?
You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.
VGT vs VTV, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | VGT | VTV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +27.13% | +15.30% | VGT |
| 2025 | +21.77% | +15.27% | VGT |
| 2024 | +29.30% | +15.95% | VGT |
| 2023 | +52.66% | +9.32% | VGT |
| 2022 | -29.70% | -2.09% | VTV |
| 2021 | +30.45% | +26.53% | VGT |
| 2020 | +46.04% | +2.33% | VGT |
| 2019 | +48.62% | +25.66% | VGT |
| 2018 | +2.46% | -5.47% | VGT |
| 2017 | +37.08% | +17.14% | VGT |
| 2016 | +13.77% | +17.10% | VTV |
| 2015 | +5.05% | -0.98% | VGT |
| 2014 | +16.69% | +13.17% | VGT |
| 2013 | +30.97% | +33.09% | VTV |
| 2012 | +13.96% | +15.18% | VTV |
| 2011 | +0.54% | +1.11% | VTV |
| 2010 | +12.78% | +14.54% | VTV |
| 2009 | +61.89% | +19.88% | VGT |
| 2008 | -42.82% | -35.89% | VTV |
| 2007 | +14.78% | -0.12% | VGT |
| 2006 | +8.85% | +22.38% | VTV |
| 2005 | +3.00% | +7.21% | VTV |
| 2004 | -2.86% | +13.85% | VTV |
VGT vs VTV in plain words
VGT tracks the MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index while VTV follows the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VGT charges 0.09% a year in running costs and VTV charges 0.03% — VTV is the cheaper fund to hold.
Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 23 calendar years both funds were trading, VGT finished the year ahead 13 times and VTV 10 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $76,464 in VGT versus $30,183 in VTV by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.
Fund facts: VGT vs VTV
| Fact | VGT | VTV |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Vanguard Information Technology ETF | Vanguard Value ETF |
| Tracks | MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index | CRSP US Large Cap Value Index |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.03% |
| Dividends | Distributing — dividends paid out | Distributing — dividends paid out |
| Launched | 26 Jan 2004 | 26 Jan 2004 |
Frequently asked
Is VGT or VTV better?
Across the 23 calendar years both funds were trading, VGT finished the year ahead 13 times and VTV 10 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $76,464 in VGT versus $30,183 in VTV by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between VGT and VTV?
VGT tracks the MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index while VTV follows the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VGT charges 0.09% a year in running costs and VTV charges 0.03% — VTV is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.
What would $10,000 in VGT have become?
$10,000 invested in VGT at the start of 2016 grew to $76,464 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 22.6% per year.