IVV vs VGT: which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
IVVtracks the S&P 500 Index
VGTtracks the MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index
IVV tracks the S&P 500 IndexVGT tracks the MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index
What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?
You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.
IVV vs VGT, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | IVV | VGT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +9.92% | +27.13% | VGT |
| 2025 | +17.85% | +21.77% | VGT |
| 2024 | +24.93% | +29.30% | VGT |
| 2023 | +26.31% | +52.66% | VGT |
| 2022 | -18.16% | -29.70% | IVV |
| 2021 | +28.76% | +30.45% | VGT |
| 2020 | +18.40% | +46.04% | VGT |
| 2019 | +31.25% | +48.62% | VGT |
| 2018 | -4.49% | +2.46% | VGT |
| 2017 | +21.75% | +37.08% | VGT |
| 2016 | +11.54% | +13.77% | VGT |
| 2015 | +1.28% | +5.05% | VGT |
| 2014 | +13.57% | +16.69% | VGT |
| 2013 | +32.31% | +30.97% | IVV |
| 2012 | +16.06% | +13.96% | IVV |
| 2011 | +1.88% | +0.54% | IVV |
| 2010 | +15.10% | +12.78% | IVV |
| 2009 | +26.61% | +61.89% | VGT |
| 2008 | -37.01% | -42.82% | IVV |
| 2007 | +5.29% | +14.78% | VGT |
| 2006 | +15.94% | +8.85% | IVV |
| 2005 | +4.87% | +3.00% | IVV |
| 2004 | +10.79% | -2.86% | IVV |
| 2003 | +28.46% | — | — |
| 2002 | -21.53% | — | — |
| 2001 | -11.96% | — | — |
| 2000 | -6.08% | — | — |
IVV vs VGT in plain words
IVV tracks the S&P 500 Index while VGT follows the MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. IVV charges 0.03% a year in running costs and VGT charges 0.09% — IVV is the cheaper fund to hold.
Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 23 calendar years both funds were trading, IVV finished the year ahead 9 times and VGT 14 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $39,497 in IVV versus $76,464 in VGT by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.
Fund facts: IVV vs VGT
| Fact | IVV | VGT |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | Vanguard Information Technology ETF |
| Tracks | S&P 500 Index | MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.09% |
| Dividends | Distributing — dividends paid out | Distributing — dividends paid out |
| Launched | 15 May 2000 | 26 Jan 2004 |
Frequently asked
Is IVV or VGT better?
Across the 23 calendar years both funds were trading, IVV finished the year ahead 9 times and VGT 14 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $39,497 in IVV versus $76,464 in VGT by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between IVV and VGT?
IVV tracks the S&P 500 Index while VGT follows the MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. IVV charges 0.03% a year in running costs and VGT charges 0.09% — IVV is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.
What would $10,000 in IVV have become?
$10,000 invested in IVV at the start of 2016 grew to $39,497 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 14.7% per year.